• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

10,000 Research Papers Were Retracted In 2023, Breaking Annual Records

December 19, 2023 by Deborah Bloomfield

It was a bad year for science publishing with more than 10,000 research papers being retracted, setting a new record for the most retractions in a single year. The results suggest this is just a fraction of the dodgy papers still out there.

According to recent analysis conducted by Nature, the number of retractions issued in 2023 has surpassed previous annual records, with the worse offenders being from large research-publishing nations such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Russia, and China. These countries have had the highest retraction rates over the last two decades.

Advertisement

The publisher Hindawi, a London-based subsidiary of Wiley, has been responsible for most of the retractions to date. This year, the publisher has retracted over 8,000 articles due to what it believes are compromises to the peer-review process. This investigation was prompted by internal editors and research-integrity investigators who raised concerns about irrelevant references in thousands of papers, as well as incoherent text.

“In the dynamic world of scholarly publishing, researchers find themselves grappling between increasing pressures to publish and the growing vulnerability of the academic industry to systematic manipulation and fraudulent activity”, Hindawi has stated.

“As key players in the open access landscape, we faced serious disruptions and issued large numbers of article retractions in response to these research integrity challenges.”

One of the issues here has been Hindawi’s reliance on special issues, which are collections of articles that tend to be overseen by guest editors. These collections have become a focal point for scammers pretending to be guest editors so they can publish fake papers.

Advertisement

Although they have been “in the eye of this storm” in the last few years, Hindawi is not alone. This is a hurdle faced by all academic publishers and represents a major challenge for the future.

A rise in fraudulent efforts

The big issue, according to Richard Van Noorden of Nature, is “Retractions are rising at a rate that outstrips the growth of scientific papers.”

To investigate this, Nature combined the number of retractions collated by the media organization Retraction Watch with another 5,000 retractions from Hindawi and other publishers, with the help of the Dimensions database.

“Nature’s analysis suggests that the retraction rate – the proportion of papers published in any given year that go on to be retracted – has more than trebled in the past decade. In 2022, it exceeded 0.2 [percent].”

Advertisement

Among the countries that have had the highest numbers of retractions (more than 100,000 in the last 20 years), Saudi Arabia is the highest scoring with “30 per 10,000 articles” being retracted (excluding retractions based on conference papers).

“If conference papers are included, withdrawals from the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in New York City put China in the lead, with a retraction rate above 30 per 10,000 articles,” Van Noorden explains.

Representatives from IEEE have explained that they feel their preventive measure and efforts work well to catch most fraudulent papers thrown their way, but Retraction Watch has found issues such as “tortured phrases, citation fraud and plagiarism, in hundreds of IEEE papers published in the past few years,” Van Noorden adds.

However, IEEE has apparently evaluated those papers and has found fewer than 60 did not reach their publication standards, 39 of which have been retracted so far.

Advertisement

This is just the tip of a deep iceberg is seems, with papers created by paper mills – businesses that sell fake work and authorships – being one of the biggest contributors across the world. These papers still cause issues even if they are not read, because their results (alleged results) are included and aggregated with others when scientists write review articles.

Science in practice 

Despite the disturbing rise in fake papers and dodgy authors, the fact that publishers are retracting these dishonest contributions is a strength of the scientific and scholarly publishing world. Being alive to the possibility of fraud, and willing to review the evidence and reject those that fail to meet our standards, demonstrates that there still is an appreciation for honesty and integrity within the system. 

But with the growing ease with which misinformation can spread and scientific data can be created through AI tools such as ChatGPT, we all have to be aware that not everything we read is as it seems.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Paris ramps up security as jihadist attacks trial starts
  2. Cricket-‘Western bloc’ has let Pakistan down, board chief says
  3. Ancient Bison Found In Permafrost Is So Well Preserved Scientists Want To Clone It
  4. Where Inside Us Do We Feel Love?

Source Link: 10,000 Research Papers Were Retracted In 2023, Breaking Annual Records

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • There Is A Very Simple Test To See If You Have Aphantasia
  • Bringing Extinct Animals To Life: Is Artificial Intelligence Helping Or Harming Palaeoart?
  • This Brilliant Map Has 3D Models Of Nearly Every Single Building In The World – All 2.75 Billion Of Them
  • These Hognose Snakes Have The Most Dramatic Defense Technique You’ve Ever Seen
  • Titan, Saturn’s Biggest Moon, Might Not Have A Secret Ocean After All
  • The World’s Oldest Individual Animal Was Born In 1499 CE. In 2006, Humans Accidentally Killed It.
  • What Is Glaze Ice? The Strange (And Deadly) Frozen Phenomenon That Locks Plants Inside Icicles
  • Has Anyone Ever Actually Been Swallowed By A Whale?
  • First-Known Instance Of Bees Laying Eggs In Fossilized Tooth Sockets Discovered In 20,000-Year-Old Bones
  • Polar Bear Mom Adopts Cub – Only The 13th Known Case Of Adoption In 45 Years Of Study At Hudson Bay
  • The Longest-Running Evolution Experiment Has Been Going For 80,000 Generations
  • From Shrink Rays And Simulated Universes To Medical Mishaps And More: The Stories That Made The Vault In 2025
  • Fastest Cretaceous Theropod Yet Discovered In 120-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Trackway
  • What’s The Moon Made Of?
  • First Hubble View Of The Crab Nebula In 24 Years Is A Thing Of Beauty… With Mysterious “Knots”
  • “Orbital House Of Cards”: One Solar Storm And 2.8 Days Could End In Disaster For Earth And Its Satellites
  • Astronomical Winter Vs. Meteorological Winter: What’s The Difference?
  • Do Any Animal Species Actively Hunt Humans As Prey?
  • “What The Heck Is This?”: JWST Reveals Bizarre Exoplanet With Inexplicable Composition
  • The Animal With The Strongest Bite Chomps Down With A Force Of Over 16,000 Newtons
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version