• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Astrophysicist Figures Out 17th-Century Astronomer Was Nearsighted By Looking At His Telescopes

March 25, 2023 by Deborah Bloomfield

An astrophysicist has discovered that 17th-century mathematician and astronomer Christiaan Huygens was likely near-sighted by looking at designs for his telescopes.

Huygens, perhaps best known for his study of Saturn’s rings and the discovery of one of its moons, Titan, manufactured his own telescopes. Towards the end of his life, he began trying to figure out focal distances of two lenses to get an optimized view of distant objects.

Advertisement

Using his studies, he and his brother created what they thought were telescopes offering the best focus. Unfortunately, as astrophysicist Alexander G. M. Pietrow writes in his paper, “Huygens’ telescopes were in fact far from optimal”. There were also discrepancies between Huygens’ equations and the final telescopes he built, in that he used shorter focus, overmagnifying the objects he was looking at.

“This seemingly arbitrary limitation could be explained if Huygens had a visual condition and built his telescopes in such a way that he could compensate for it,” Pietrow writes in the paper, “not unlike people do today when taking off their glasses to look through a telescope and then adjusting the focus to get an image that is sharp for their eyes, a process in which they are in fact replacing the correction of their glasses for an adjustment of the focal length of the telescope.”

Several members of Huygens’ family, including his father, were known to be nearsighted, but Christiaan did not wear glasses, which Pietrow believes implies he was only somewhat shortsighted. This fit with his own estimates, produced by comparing Huygen’s empirically-derived equations for optimal focus with what we have now derived through the development of calculus and our improved understanding of optics.

Pietrow found that Huygens had a “mild case of myopia (or near-sightedness) and that he compensated this condition by building telescopes that overmagnified by a factor of 3.5. Based on this hypothesis, Huygens’ visual acuity is estimated to be around 20/70, which on average corresponds to an optical prescription of −1.5 diopters.”

Advertisement

Pietrow said in a statement that “This is likely the first ever posthumous eyeglass prescription ever, and done for someone who lived 330 years ago at that!”

As well as it being undeniably cool to play optometrist to someone who died centuries ago, it possibly explains why Huygens’ business wasn’t really booming.

“Assuming that these telescopes were designed for Huygens’ imperfect eyesight provides a possible explanation as to why his telescopes never gained a large circulation outside of his family,” Pietrow says in the paper.

The study was published in the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. 5 things you need to win your first customer
  2. Britain to say Brexit arrangements for Northern Ireland are too harmful to retain
  3. Hearts From COVID-19 Patients Still Safe For Organ Transplant
  4. South Park Creators Use ChatGPT To Co-Write Episode About AI

Source Link: Astrophysicist Figures Out 17th-Century Astronomer Was Nearsighted By Looking At His Telescopes

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • What’s Behind The “Florida Skunk Ape” Sightings? A Black Bear, Or Something Else?
  • Hubble Telescope’s Bite Of Dracula’s Chivito Reveals Chaos In The Largest Known Planet-Forming Disk
  • All Animals, Plants, And Fungi On Earth Can Be Traced Back To A Common Ancestor: The “Asgardians”
  • The Only Known (Nearly) Complete Green Mummy Just Revealed Why It’s So Green
  • What Happened To The Vasa? Arguably The Least Successful Ship In History
  • Decorating Your Home With Seasonal Plants? They Could Be A Holiday Hazard For Pets
  • The 9th Dedekind Number: Why It Took 32 Years To Find, And Why We May Never See A 10th
  • Alaska Saw More Wildfires In The Last Century Than In The Previous 3,000 Years
  • If Bird Flu Spills Over To Humans,This Is What Would Happen In A Very Short Period
  • This Unusual Plant Might Be One Of Evolution’s “Weirdest Experiments”
  • In 1940, A Dog Investigated A Hole In A Tree And Discovered A Vast Cave Filled With Ancient Human Artwork
  • “Time Is Not Broken”: US Officials Work To Correct Time, After Discovering It Is 4.8 Microseconds Out
  • The Evolutionary Reason Why Rage Bait Affects Us – And How To Deal With It This Holiday Season
  • Whales Living To 200 May Actually Be The Norm – There’s A Sad Reason Why We Don’t Know Yet
  • IFLScience The Big Questions: Can Magic Be Used As A Tool In Science?
  • Sheep And… Rhinos? There’s A Very Cute Reason You See Them Hanging Out Together
  • Why Does The Latest Sunrise Of The Year Not Fall On The Winter Solstice?
  • Real Or Fake Christmas Trees: Which Is Better For The Environment?
  • “Cosmic Dipole Anomaly” Suggests That Our Universe May Be “Lopsided”, Seriously Challenging Our Understanding Of The Cosmos
  • Which Animals Mate For Life?
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version