• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Biden’s new FTC nominee is a digital privacy advocate critical of Big Tech

September 14, 2021 by David Barret Leave a Comment

President Biden made his latest nomination to the Federal Trade Commission this week, tapping digital privacy expert Alvaro Bedoya to join the agency as it takes a hard look at the tech industry.

Bedoya is the founding director of the Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown’s law school and previously served as chief counsel for former Senator Al Franken and the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law. Bedoya has worked on legislation addressing some of the most pressing privacy issues in tech, including stalkerware and facial recognition systems.

It is the honor of my life to be nominated to serve on the FTC. When my family landed at JFK in 1987 with 4 suitcases and a grad student stipend, this was not what we expected. Thank you @JoeBiden and @linakhanFTC, thank you Sima, my love, mom, dad, Pablo, our families. Vamos.

— Alvaro Bedoya (@alvarombedoya) September 13, 2021

In 2016, Bedoya co-authored a report titled “The Perpetual Line-Up: Unregulated Police Face Recognition in America,” a year-long investigation that dove deeply into the police use of facial recognition systems in the U.S. The 2016 report examined law enforcement’s reliance on facial recognition systems and biometric databases on a state level. It argued that regulations are desperately needed to curtail potential abuses and algorithmic failures before the technology inevitably becomes even more commonplace.

Bedoya also isn’t shy about calling out Big Tech. In a New York Times op-ed a few years ago, he took aim at Silicon Valley companies giving user privacy lip service in public while quietly funneling millions toward lobbyists to undermine consumer privacy. The new FTC nominee singled out Facebook specifically, pointing to the company’s efforts to undermine the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, a state law that serves as one of the only meaningful checks on invasive privacy practices in the U.S.

Bedoya argued that the tech industry would have an easier time shaping a single, sweeping piece of privacy regulations with its lobbying efforts rather than a flurry of targeted, smaller bills. Antitrust advocates in Congress taking aim at tech today seem to have learned that same lesson as well.

“We cannot underestimate the tech sector’s power in Congress and in state legislatures,” Bedoya wrote. “If the United States tries to pass broad rules for personal data, that effort may well be co-opted by Silicon Valley, and we’ll miss our best shot at meaningful privacy protections.”

If confirmed, Bedoya would join big tech critic Lina Khan, a recent Biden FTC nominee who now chairs the agency. Khan’s focus on antitrust and Amazon in particular would dovetail with Bedoya’s focus on adjacent privacy concerns, making the pair a formidable regulatory presence as the Biden administration seeks to rein in some of the tech industry’s most damaging excesses.

Biden elevates tech antitrust crusader Lina Khan to FTC chair

Portland passes expansive city ban on facial recognition tech

Maine’s facial recognition law shows bipartisan support for protecting privacy

Source Link Biden’s new FTC nominee is a digital privacy advocate critical of Big Tech

David Barret
David Barret

Related posts:

  1. Golf-Garcia, Lowry and Poulter made captain’s picks for Europe’s Ryder Cup team
  2. Japan’s vaccines minister Kono favoured as next PM in opinion polls
  3. Hit to oil output from Ida overshadows demand impact, says Goldman
  4. Nigeria says 75 abducted children released amid army crackdown

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • The Amazon Is Entering A “Hypertropical” Climate For The First Time In 10 Million Years
  • What Scientists Saw When They Peered Inside 190-Million-Year-Old Eggs And Recreated Some Of The World’s Oldest Dinosaur Embryos
  • Is 1 Dog Year Really The Same As 7 Human Years?
  • Were Dinosaur Eggs Soft Like A Reptile’s, Or Hard Like A Bird’s?
  • What Causes All The Symptoms Of Long COVID And ME/CFS? The Brainstem Could Be The Key
  • The Only Bugs In Antarctica Are Already Eating Microplastics
  • Like Mars, Europa Has A Spider Shape, And Now We Might Know Why
  • How Did Ancient Wolves Get Onto This Remote Island 5,000 Years Ago?
  • World-First Footage Of Amur Tigress With 5 Cubs Marks Huge Conservation Win
  • Happy Birthday, Flossie! The World’s Oldest Living Cat Just Turned 30
  • We Might Finally Know Why Humans Gave Up Making Our Own Vitamin C
  • Hippo Birthday Parties, Chubby-Cheeked Dinosaurs, And A Giraffe With An Inhaler: The Most Wholesome Science Stories Of 2025
  • One Of The World’s Rarest, Smallest Dolphins May Have Just Been Spotted Off New Zealand’s Coast
  • Gaming May Be Popular, But Can It Damage A Resume?
  • A Common Condition Makes The Surinam Toad Pure Nightmare Fuel For Some People
  • In 1815, The Largest Eruption In Recorded History Plunged Earth Into A Volcanic Winter
  • JWST Finds The Best Evidence Yet Of A Lava World With A Thick Atmosphere
  • Officially Gone: After 40 Years MIA, Australia’s Only Shrew Has Been Declared “Extinct”
  • Horrifically Disfigured Skeleton Known As “The Prince” Was Likely Mauled To Death By A Bear 27,000 Years Ago
  • Manumea, Dodo’s Closest Living Relative, Seen Alive After 5-Year Disappearance
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version