• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

California’s First Carbon Capture Plant Gets Greenlit, Set To Absorb 46 Million Tonnes Of CO2

October 29, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

After receiving the thumbs up from regulators, California is set to build its first carbon capture plant with a project that aims to suck up CO2 and inject it deep underground where it can’t meddle with Earth’s climate.

Last week, the Kern County Board of Supervisors approved a permit for the California Resources Corp (CRC) to construct a carbon capture and storage facility at the Elk Hills Oil Field in the San Joaquin Valley, California.

Advertisement

The plan is to effectively capture CO2 emitted from industrial sources and pump it into the depleted oil reservoirs found deep beneath Kern County. With the aim of making Elk Hills Field “one of the premier CO2 sequestration sites in the US,” the CRC estimates it will be capable of receiving over 1 million tonnes of CO2 each year, equivalent to the annual emissions of around 200,000 cars. 

In total, it has the potential to store up to 46 million tonnes of CO2.

“This is a significant step forward for Kern County and CRC in supporting energy transition in California. We believe that carbon capture technology will lead to the creation of new energy jobs and improve air quality in Kern County,” Francisco Leon, President and Chief Executive Officer of CRC, said in a statement.  

California has set the goal of being carbon neutral by 2045 – although that doesn’t mean they’ll stop pumping oil. Along with transitioning some parts of energy production to renewables, part of the state’s plans will use carbon capture and storage to offset the use of fossil fuels. 

Advertisement

Carbon capture is a contentious topic. Its advocates claim it could be a useful tool to wean the world away from oil and gas, plus it might be the only realistic way to achieve net-zero emissions in a few decades. Meanwhile, critics argue that it’s unproven, unsafe, costly, and ultimately allows the fossil fuels industry to continue unaccountable.

Given the risks, some local groups in Kern Country have launched opposition to the new project. As reported by Inside Climate News and KVPR, nearby towns have expressed fears that the carbon could leak to the surface where it would act as an asphyxiant gas. Furthermore, some geophysicists have also raised concerns that the injection of gas into bedrock could even induce earthquakes through “induced seismicity.” 

“Kern must prioritize other direct emission reduction strategies instead of CCS [carbon capture and storage]. It’s an unproven gamble with a long history of worsening air pollution and threatening public health and safety,” Natalia Ospina, legal director for the Center on Race, Poverty, & the Environment, told the Los Angeles Times.

“Overburdened communities in Kern County should not be the guinea pigs for this technology,” said Ospina.

Advertisement

For their part, the CRC told the media outlets that the Kern County Planning and Natural Resources Department has written an extensive report to evaluate all the potential risks involved. They also claim that the technology, although novel to California, has been safely operated in other parts of the world for decades.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. No ‘magic wand’ to fix Lebanon crisis, new prime minister says
  2. Factbox: How Fed policymaker investments stack up against each other
  3. Why Are People Talking About A Redesign Of The COVID-19 Vaccines?
  4. Mathematical Model Explains Why Male Mammals Do Not Breastfeed Their Young

Source Link: California's First Carbon Capture Plant Gets Greenlit, Set To Absorb 46 Million Tonnes Of CO2

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Unethical Experiments: When Scientists Really Should Have Stopped What They Were Doing Immediately
  • The First Humans Were Hunted By Leopards And Weren’t The Apex Predators We Thought They Were
  • Earth’s Passage Through The Galaxy Might Be Written In Its Rocks
  • What Is An Einstein Cross – And Why Is The Latest One Such A Unique Find?
  • If We Found Life On Mars, What Would That Mean For The Fermi Paradox And The Great Filter?
  • The Longest Living Mammals Are Giants That Live Up To 200 Years In The Icy Arctic
  • Entirely New Virus Detected In Bat Urine, And It’s Only The 4th Of Its Kind Ever Isolated
  • The First Ever Full Asteroid History: From Its Doomed Discovery To Collecting Its Meteorites
  • World’s Oldest Pachycephalosaur Fossil Pushes Back These Dinosaurs’ Emergence By 15 Million Years
  • The Hole In The Ozone Layer Is Healing And On Track For Full Recovery In The 21st Century, Thanks To Science
  • First Sweet Potato Genome Reveals They’re Hybrids With A Puzzling Past And 6 Sets Of Chromosomes
  • Why Is The Top Of Canada So Sparsely Populated? Meet The “Canadian Shield”
  • Humans Are In The Middle Of “A Great Evolutionary Transition”, New Paper Claims
  • Why Do Some Toilets Have Two Flush Buttons?
  • 130-Year-Old Butter Additive Discovered In Danish Basement Contains Bacteria From The 1890s
  • Prehistoric Humans Made Necklaces From Marine Mollusk Fossils 20,000 Years Ago
  • Zond 5: In 1968 Two Soviet Steppe Tortoises Beat Humans To Orbiting Around The Moon
  • Why Cats Adapted This Defense Mechanism From Snakes
  • Mother Orca Seen Carrying Dead Calf Once Again On Washington Coast
  • A Busy Spider Season Is Brewing: Why This Fall Could See A Boom Of Arachnid Activity
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version