• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Do Women Make Better Astronauts? They Might Be More Tolerant To Spaceflight

June 25, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

We’ve said it before and we’ll say it again: women make better astronauts (according to science). Now, thanks to a recent study on the effects of space travel on the human immune system, we have all the more reason to believe that female folk may be more tolerant to the stresses of space than men.

Advertisement

Granted, the study was very small and the findings are preliminary, but as its authors write, it does suggest that “males appear to be more affected by spaceflight, for almost all cell types and metrics.”

Advertisement

The researchers were attempting to understand how the unique conditions of spaceflight – including microgravity, fluid shifts, and radiation – impact astronauts’ immune responses. To do so, they focused on people who were part of the SpaceX Inspiration4 mission in 2021 – the first all-civilian mission to orbit.

Overall, they found “conserved and distinct immune disruptions”. For example, markers related to inflammation, aging, and muscle homeostasis had changed after spaceflight and they identified what they call a “spaceflight signature” of gene expression. In short, space can have a big impact on the body.

But they also noticed some interesting sex-dependent differences in response to spaceflight, which is an area of research that has been largely neglected.

“Sex-specific variation in immune response is frequently observed in clinical settings, but poorly understood, and this phenomenon has yet to be investigated in-depth at the single-cell level during spaceflight,” the team write. To change this, they examined the immune responses of two men and two women who were part of Inspiration4, and compared with data from 64 NASA astronauts.

Advertisement

Males, they found, experienced greater disruption to gene expression following spaceflight, with more differentially expressed genes – genes that show significant differences in expression levels between two or more groups – and a slower recovery to the baseline of this expression. Proteins, including IL-6, IL-8, and fibrinogen – which have important roles in infection defense, inflammation, and blood clotting, respectively – were also found to have sex-specific differences following spaceflight.

“The aggregate data thus far indicates that the gene regulatory and immune response to spaceflight is more sensitive in males.”

The reasons behind this difference are not yet clear, but senior author Professor Christopher Mason suggests it could have something to do with having a body primed for pregnancy. “Being able to tolerate large changes in physiology and fluid dynamics may be great for being able to manage pregnancy but also manage the stress of spaceflight at a physiological level,” he told the Guardian.

Whatever the reason, the study’s findings have important implications for future space travel, which could mean we see the gender gap in space – only 11 percent of the world’s astronauts are women! – redressed.

Advertisement

“More studies will be needed to confirm these trends,” the researchers conclude, “but such results can have implications for recovery times and possibly crew selection (e.g., more females) for high-altitude, lunar, and deep space missions.”

The study is published in Nature Communications.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Sendoso nabs $100M as its corporate gifting platform passes 20,000 customers
  2. World’s Largest Offshore Wind Farm Is Finally Operational
  3. The World’s Heaviest Fruit Is Something You Might Not Expect
  4. New Details On The Life And Death Of Vittrup Man Uncovered After 5,000 Years

Source Link: Do Women Make Better Astronauts? They Might Be More Tolerant To Spaceflight

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • In 1954, Soviet Scientist Vladimir Demikhov Performed “The Most Controversial Experimental Operation Of The 20th Century”
  • Watch Platinum Crystals Forming In Liquid Metal Thanks To “Really Special” New Technique
  • Why Do Cuttlefish Have Wavy Pupils?
  • How Many Teeth Did T. Rex Have?
  • What Is The Rarest Color In Nature? It’s Not Blue
  • When Did Some Ancient Extinct Species Return To The Sea? Machine Learning Helps Find The Answer
  • Australia Is About To Ban Social Media For Under-16s. What Will That Look Like (And Is It A Good Idea?)
  • Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS May Have A Course-Altering Encounter Before It Heads Towards The Gemini Constellation
  • When Did Humans First Start Eating Meat?
  • The Biggest Deposit Of Monetary Gold? It Is Not Fort Knox, It’s In A Manhattan Basement
  • Is mRNA The Future Of Flu Shots? New Vaccine 34.5 Percent More Effective Than Standard Shots In Trials
  • What Did Dodo Meat Taste Like? Probably Better Than You’ve Been Led To Believe
  • Objects Look Different At The Speed Of Light: The “Terrell-Penrose” Effect Gets Visualized In Twisted Experiment
  • The Universe Could Be Simple – We Might Be What Makes It Complicated, Suggests New Quantum Gravity Paper Prof Brian Cox Calls “Exhilarating”
  • First-Ever Human Case Of H5N5 Bird Flu Results In Death Of Washington State Resident
  • This Region Of The US Was Riddled With “Forever Chemicals.” They Just Discovered Why.
  • There Is Something “Very Wrong” With Our Understanding Of The Universe, Telescope Final Data Confirms
  • An Ethiopian Shield Volcano Has Just Erupted, For The First Time In Thousands Of Years
  • The Quietest Place On Earth Has An Ambient Sound Level Of Minus 24.9 Decibels
  • Physicists Say The Entire Universe Might Only Need One Constant – Time
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version