• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Double-Slit Experiment Performed With Single Atoms Shows Einstein Was Wrong

July 31, 2025 by Deborah Bloomfield

Researchers at MIT have conducted what they are calling the most “idealized” double-slit experiment yet, finding further evidence that Einstein’s take on the phenomenon is likely incorrect.

The double-slit experiment and its variations is one of the weirdest results humans found as we began to study the world scientifically. In 1801, Thomas Young took a light and shone it through a double-slit onto a screen behind it. At the time the corpuscular idea of light, proposed by Isaac Newton, was the prevailing hypothesis about what light is, suggesting that light was a massless particle dubbed a “corpuscle”.

But when Young shone a light through the double-slits, the pattern it made on the screen behind it was not what you would expect if light were simply a particle. Rather than two blobs of light, it produced an interference pattern, as if two ripples of waves were emerging on the other side of the slit and interfering with each other.



This helped scientists learn of the wave-like nature of light, but the experiment got stranger still the more that scientists looked into it. For an obvious example, when you attempt to detect which slit the light went through, the interference pattern disappears and you are left with a pattern which suggests that light is in fact acting like a particle.

Einstein, who won his Nobel Prize for his work on the photoelectric effect demonstrating that light acts as both a wave and a particle dubbed a photon, was well aware of this effect and debated at length with Niels Bohr on the topic. Einstein thought that with the right experimental setup – for example using a screen attached to sensitive springs to detect which slit the photon went through – it would be possible to detect the path the photon took, without disturbing the interference pattern. Bohr, meanwhile, used Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle – which states that the more we know about a particle’s position, the less we know about its momentum – to show that detecting the path would always wipe out the interference pattern.

Unfortunately for Einstein, all work done subsequently – including experiments that used springs – does point to the interference pattern disappearing when the photon’s path is detected. In the latest blow, scientists have done so during the most “idealized” double-slit experiment so far.

The researchers from MIT were actually studying ultracold atoms, and how the scattering of light off them can reveal their properties. 

“We realized we can quantify the degree to which this scattering process is like a particle or a wave,” first author Vitaly Fedoseev explained in a statement, “and we quickly realized we can apply this new method to realize this famous experiment in a very idealized way.”

In the experiment, they cooled over 10,000 atoms to microkelvin temperatures in a cloud, and used laser beams to manipulate them into a crystal-like lattice. In this setup, each individual atom was far enough away from its neighbor that you could see it as a single, isolated atom. When they shone a weak beam of light through the atoms, as it passed between two neighboring atoms, this was like it passing through two slits in the classic experiment.

“What we have done can be regarded as a new variant to the double-slit experiment,” Wolfgang Ketterle, the John D. MacArthur Professor of Physics, added. “These single atoms are like the smallest slits you could possibly build.”

For the experiment, the team could also adjust how tightly the atoms were held in place. Allowing them more freedom, making them “fuzzier”, the atoms would become rustled more easily by the light beam, and as such you would expect increased probability that the light would behave as a photon rather than a wave. Looking at the data collected behind the cloud of atoms by an ultrasensitive detector, the team found that the results closely matched theoretical predictions by quantum mechanics. This appears to agree with the evidence that Einstein was wrong on this topic, and an idealized experiment using a spring would yield the same result.

“In many descriptions, the springs play a major role. But we show, no, the springs do not matter here; what matters is only the fuzziness of the atoms,” Fedoseev added. “Therefore,  one has to use a more profound description, which uses quantum correlations between photons and atoms.”

All these years after the birth of quantum mechanics, its predictions are still the best we have, as well as baffling to observe. This is unlikely the last you will hear of its most famous experiment.

The study is published in Physical Review Letters.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Audi launches its newest EV, the 2022 Q4 e-tron SUV
  2. Dinosaur Prints Found Under Restaurant Table Confirmed As 100 Million Years Old
  3. Archax: Japanese Engineers Make Transformer Robot That Actually Works
  4. How Do We Know There Is Anything Beyond The Observable Universe?

Source Link: Double-Slit Experiment Performed With Single Atoms Shows Einstein Was Wrong

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • A Vast Ocean Of Water May Be Trapped In The Transition Zone Beneath Our Feet
  • Beneath Antarctica’s Sea Ice, Leopard Seals Sing Nursery Rhymes In Search Of Love
  • Double-Slit Experiment Performed With Single Atoms Shows Einstein Was Wrong
  • Forecasting Tomorrow: How Science Fiction Is Helping Scientists Explore Possible Futures
  • Siberian Mummy’s 2,000-Year-Old Tattoos Reveal The History Of Ancient Art
  • Humans Were Buzzing On Psychoactive Betel Nuts 4,000 Years Ago
  • Megaflash Stretching 892 Kilometers Sets New World Record For Longest Lightning Strike
  • Your Organs Don’t All Age At The Same Rate. One Is Growing Old Much Quicker Than Others
  • IFLScience The Big Questions: How Has The Internet Changed The Way We Use Language?
  • One Of The Most Dangerous Volcanoes Is Home To The World’s Largest Lava Lake
  • What Astrobiology Might Tell Us About What Aliens May Look Like
  • Voyager: An Inside Look At NASA’s Longest-Running Mission With Someone There From The Start
  • Meet Alba: The World’s Only Known Albino Orangutan Still Living In Borneo
  • Yikes! Baby African Social Spiders Filmed Eating Their Moms Start-To-Finish For The First Time
  • Why Is The Great Rift Valley So Important In Our Understanding Of Human Evolution?
  • 6th Strongest Earthquake On Record – An Incredible 8.8 Magnitude – Triggers Tsunamis And Volcanic Eruption
  • Avoid These 7 Common Objects That Can “Wreck” Your Wi-Fi Signal
  • “The Blob” Triggered The Largest Single-Species Event In Modern History, Killing 4 Million Seabirds
  • Someone Invited The Internet To Give “One Good Reason” The Magnet Truck Won’t Work, And They Absolutely Delivered
  • Earth’s Most Show-Stopping Electrical Storm Sees 280 Lightning Bolts An Hour
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version