• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Europe’s top court slaps down ‘zero rating’ again

September 2, 2021 by David Barret Leave a Comment

Europe’s top court has dealt another blow to ‘zero rating’ — ruling for a second time that the controversial carrier practice goes against the European Union’s rules on open Internet access.

‘Zero rating’ refers to commercial offers that can be made by mobile network operators to entice customers by excluding the data consumption of certain (often popular) apps from a user’s tariff.

The practice is controversial because it goes against the ‘level playing field’ principle of the open Internet (aka ‘net neutrality’).

EU legislators passed the bloc’s first set of open Internet/net neutrality rules back in 2015 — with the law coming into application in 2016 — but critics warned at the time over vague provisions in the regulation which they suggested could be used by carriers to undermine the core fairness principle of treating all Internet traffic the same.

Some regional telcos have continued to put out zero rating offers — which has led to a number of challenges to test the robustness of the law. But the viability of zero rating within the EU must now be in doubt given the double slap-down by the CJEU.

In its first major decision last year — relating to a challenge against Telenor in Hungary — the court found that commercial use of zero rating was liable to limit the exercise of end users’ rights within the meaning of the regulation.

Its ruling today — which relates to a challenge against zero rating by Vodafone and Telekom Deutschland in Germany (this time with a roaming component) — comes to what looks like an even clearer conclusion, with the court giving the practice very short shrift indeed.

“By today’s judgments, the Court of Justice notes that a ‘zero tariff’ option, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, draws a distinction within internet traffic, on the basis of commercial considerations, by not counting towards the basic package traffic to partner applications. Such a commercial practice is contrary to the general obligation of equal treatment of traffic, without discrimination or interference, as required by the regulation on open internet access,” it writes in a (notably brief) press release summarizing the judgement.

“Since those limitations on bandwidth, tethering or on use when roaming apply only on account of the activation of the ‘zero tariff’ option, which is contrary to the regulation on open internet access, they are also incompatible with EU law,” it added.

We’ve reached out to Vodafone and Telekom Deutschland for comment on the ruling.

In a statement welcoming the CJEU’s decision, the European consumer protection association BEUC’s senior digital policy officer, Maryant Fernández Pérez, subbed the ruling “very positive news for consumers and those who want the internet to stay open to all”.

“When companies like Vodafone use these ‘zero tariff’ rates, they essentially lock-in consumers and limit what the Internet can offer to them. Zero-rating is detrimental to consumer choice, competition, innovation, media diversity and freedom of information,” she added.

Europe’s top court says net neutrality rules bar ‘zero rating’

Source Link Europe’s top court slaps down ‘zero rating’ again

David Barret
David Barret

Related posts:

  1. “Our Mikis has gone”: ‘Zorba the Greek’ composer Theodorakis dies at 96
  2. WTO chief seeks fishing, pandemic accords by year end
  3. 5 Star Wars games we’d love to see on PC
  4. Amazon Labor Day sales 2021: the best early deals

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • One Of The World’s Rarest, Smallest Dolphins May Have Just Been Spotted Off New Zealand’s Coast
  • Gaming May Be Popular, But Can It Damage A Resume?
  • A Common Condition Makes The Surinam Toad Pure Nightmare Fuel For Some People
  • In 1815, The Largest Eruption In Recorded History Plunged Earth Into A Volcanic Winter
  • JWST Finds The Best Evidence Yet Of A Lava World With A Thick Atmosphere
  • Officially Gone: After 40 Years MIA, Australia’s Only Shrew Has Been Declared “Extinct”
  • Horrifically Disfigured Skeleton Known As “The Prince” Was Likely Mauled To Death By A Bear 27,000 Years Ago
  • Manumea, Dodo’s Closest Living Relative, Seen Alive After 5-Year Disappearance
  • “Globsters” Like The St Augustine Monster Have Been Washing Up For Centuries, But What Are They?
  • ADHD Meds Used By Millions Of Kids And Adults Don’t Work The Way We Thought They Did
  • Finding Diamonds Just Got A Whole Lot Easier Thanks To Science
  • Why Didn’t The World’s Largest Meteorite Leave An Impact Crater?
  • Why Do We Cry? Find Out More In Issue 42 Of CURIOUS – Out Now
  • How Many Senses Do Humans Have? It Could Be As Many As 33
  • 6 Astronomical Events To Look Forward To If You Live Long Enough
  • Atmospheric Rivers Have Shifted Toward Earth’s Poles Over The Past 40 Years, Bringing Big Weather Changes
  • Is It Time To Introduce “Category 6” Hurricanes?
  • At The Peak Of The Ice Age, Humans Built Survival Shelters Out Of Mammoth Bones
  • The World’s Longest Continuously Erupting Volcano Has Been Spewing Lava For At Least 2,000 Years
  • Rare Flat-Headed Cat Rediscovered In Thailand Following First Confirmed Sighting In Almost 30 Years
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version