• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Gender-Affirming Mastectomies Have An “Overwhelmingly Low” Regret Rate

August 9, 2023 by Deborah Bloomfield

Gender-affirming care continues to be proven to provide a high level of satisfaction and incredibly low levels of regret. The latest study looked at patients who underwent gender-affirming mastectomies from 1990 to 2020 and followed up about how they have felt since the procedure.

A double (or bilateral) mastectomy is considered a major surgery, most commonly used as a treatment (or sometimes to prevent) breast cancer no matter the gender of the patient. It is also a common gender-affirming surgery for trans-masculine and non-binary individuals. The team found 235 people eligible for the study, with 139 responding to the study authors. Most of the people surveyed who underwent the procedure are men (88), but there were a number of non-binary (17) and gender non-conforming individuals (34) who responded too.

Advertisement

The researchers used several statistical surveys to characterize how satisfied or not individuals were with the surgeries. While there are some dominant identities in the samples, there are a lot of variations in terms of experience with and after the surgery. Some people had complications following the procedure, including a small minority that had to have follow-up surgery.

The “lack of dissatisfaction and regret” was so consistent that the researchers admit that it prevented them from performing more complex analyses. On a 5-point scale, the mean satisfaction was 4.8 and the median value was 5. On a 100-point scale, with 100 representing full regret for the procedure, the mean score was 4.2 and the median was zero.

“The lack of variation in scores impeded the ability to perform a statistical analysis to establish characteristics associated with satisfaction with decision and regret. There were no individuals who underwent reversal procedures. While prospective, multicenter work is needed, these results are consistent with previous ad hoc studies and affirm the overwhelmingly low levels of regret following gender-affirming surgery,” the authors, led by Dr Megan Lane of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, wrote in the paper’s conclusions.

The results are in line with findings from other studies that report dissatisfaction with gender-affirming surgeries in about 1 percent of cases. It also challenges the notion, claimed without scientific evidence, that regrets around gender-affirming procedures might not manifest for many years.

Advertisement

The research team actually compared their work with 44 other studies focusing on surgery regrets unrelated to gender-affirming care. They found that only one study had a lower regret rate, on surgery to treat urinary incontinence, which had a mean score of 2.5. A previous study found that 18 percent of those who underwent knee replacement surgery experience regret. And yet, nobody is legislating or calling for an end to knee replacement surgery.

An accompanying commentary stresses the double standard seen when it comes to gender-affirming care, where there is a disproportionate focus in the media and legislative bodies on regret. The work shows that regret is multifactorial and it is extremely rare to be about one’s identity, and that beyond the surgery, trans and non-binary people experience stigmatization and social exclusion for being true to themselves.

“Public health efforts should bolster support systems for at-risk populations, and medical professionals should work to identify vulnerabilities associated with social determinants of health rather than deny medical care over exaggerated claims regarding the possibility of procedural regret,” the invited commentary authors wrote.

There are some limitations to the study, such as the lack of consistency in follow-up times between people in the study. The most recent procedure took place 2 years before the study, while the oldest was performed 23.6 years before this work. The team also was limited to procedures within their institutions, so they might not capture the full experience of respondents. There is also the question of non-respondents and how unaccounted responder bias might skew the results. The team would like to see a multicenter study with multiple practices to ensure the generalizability of this result.

Advertisement

The study is published in the journal JAMA Surgery.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Paris ramps up security as jihadist attacks trial starts
  2. Cricket-‘Western bloc’ has let Pakistan down, board chief says
  3. Analysis-Diverse boards to pick the next Boston and Dallas Fed bank chiefs
  4. Ancient Bison Found In Permafrost Is So Well Preserved Scientists Want To Clone It

Source Link: Gender-Affirming Mastectomies Have An "Overwhelmingly Low" Regret Rate

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • New Approach For Interstellar Navigation Was Tested On A Spacecraft 9 Billion Kilometers Away
  • For Only The Second Recorded Time, Two Novae Are Visible With The Naked Eye At Once
  • Long-Lost Ancient Egyptian City Ruled By Cobra Goddess Discovered In Nile Delta
  • Much Maligned Norwegian Lemming Is One Of The Newest Mammal Species On Earth
  • Where Are The Real Geographical Centers Of All The Continents?
  • New Species Of South African Rain Frog Discovered, And It’s Absolutely Fuming About It
  • Love Cheese But Hate Nightmares? Bad News, It Looks Like The Two Really Are Related
  • Project Hail Mary Trailer First Look: What Would Happen If The Sun Got Darker?
  • Newly Discovered Cell Structure Might Hold Key To Understanding Devastating Genetic Disorders
  • What Is Kakeya’s Needle Problem, And Why Do We Want To Solve It?
  • “I Wasn’t Prepared For The Sheer Number Of Them”: Cave Of Mummified Never-Before-Seen Eyeless Invertebrates Amazes Scientists
  • Asteroid Day At 10: How The World Is More Prepared Than Ever To Face Celestial Threats
  • What Happened When A New Zealand Man Fell Butt-First Onto A Powerful Air Hose
  • Ancient DNA Confirms Women’s Unexpected Status In One Of The Oldest Known Neolithic Settlements
  • Earth’s Weather Satellites Catch Cloud Changes… On Venus
  • Scientists Find Common Factors In People Who Have “Out-Of-Body” Experiences
  • Shocking Photos Reveal Extent Of Overfishing’s Impact On “Shrinking” Cod
  • Direct Fusion Drive Could Take Us To Sedna During Its Closest Approach In 11,000 Years
  • Earth’s Energy Imbalance Is More Than Double What It Should Be – And We Don’t Know Why
  • We May Have Misjudged A Fundamental Fact About The Cambrian Explosion
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version