• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Google Accused Of “Airbrushing” After Changing How It Calculates Your Flight’s Carbon Footprint

August 25, 2022 by Deborah Bloomfield

Google has been accused of “airbrushing” the air industry’s impact on climate change after it changed the way it calculates the carbon footprint of your flights. When you search for flights on the search engine, as well as displaying times and services, Google displays the average amount of carbon emissions pumped out by those flights. 

Prior to the update, an investigation by the BBC has found that a typical flight from Seattle to Paris would be shown to emit the equivalent of 1,070 kilograms (2,360 pounds) of carbon dioxide. After the update, the same flights would be calculated as emitting the equivalent of 521 kilograms (1,150 pounds) of CO2.

Why the difference? Since the model changed in July, it excludes the overall impacts on the environment produced by air travel. As well as the CO2 released into the atmosphere during flights, contrails help to trap heat, and nitrogen oxide emissions by aircraft also lead to increases in concentrations of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. The warming effect of air travel is not, therefore, a simple matter of calculating how much CO2 has been released. 

Studies have found that aviation is responsible for around 3.5 percent of human activities that contribute to climate change, despite its contribution of a lower 2.5 percent of global CO2 emissions. Google flights used to reflect this increased contribution to global warming in their tool, which they say is to help people make informed choices taking into account their climate impact. However, since July they have chosen to “focus on CO2 emissions”.

“Following recent discussions with academic and industry partners, we are adjusting the [flight tool] to focus on CO2 emissions,” Google wrote in a Github announcement. 

Advertisement

“While we strongly believe in including non-CO2 effects in the model long-term, the details of how and when to include these factors requires more input from our stakeholders as part of a governance model that’s in development. With this change, we are provisionally removing contrails effects from our CO2e estimates.”

Google went on to say that they believed these other factors were critical to the model, but that they wanted to incorporate factors like “time of day and regional variations in contrails’ warming impact”. They added that they were committed to providing customers with accurate information, so that they can make informed choices when traveling.

However, reacting to the change, chief scientist of Greenpeace, Dr Doug Parr, told the BBC that Google has “airbrushed a huge chunk of the aviation industry’s climate impacts from its pages”, while Professor David Lee of Manchester Metropolitan University – an expert on the contribution of air travel to the climate crisis – added that “it now significantly understates the global impact of aviation on the climate”.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Turkey, Egypt pledge further talks to normalise ties after 2nd round
  2. Business Canvas, a Korea-based document management SaaS company, closes $2.5M seed round
  3. Uber adjusts third-quarter forecast in light of increased gross bookings
  4. OSCE calls on Bosnia’s rival leaders to reform election law

Source Link: Google Accused Of "Airbrushing" After Changing How It Calculates Your Flight's Carbon Footprint

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Artificial Sweeteners Like Aspartame Linked To 1.6 Years Of Extra Brain Aging In 8-Year Study
  • The Largest Mammal To Ever Live Made African Elephants Look Incredibly Small
  • West Coast States Form New Health Alliance To Give Vaccine Advice, Saying CDC Is Now “A Political Tool”
  • Shakespeare’s Skull Is Missing
  • Is One Type Of Drinking Water Better Than Another?
  • What Food Did Neanderthals Eat? The Real “Paleodiet” Wasn’t As Meaty As You Imagine
  • Typhoon Tip: The Largest Storm Ever Could Have Swallowed Half Of The Continental US
  • Is Acrylamide Really Bad For You?
  • Macaws Learn From Watching Other Macaws Interact – A Kind Of Imitation We Thought Was Unique To Humans
  • “Volnado” Dances Around Spectacular Lava Fountain In Kīlauea Volcano Crater
  • “Impossible To Imagine”: Queen Ants Produce Babies Of 2 Different Species, And It’s Never Been Seen Before
  • It Turns Out Bending Ice Produces Electricity, And This Could Finally Explain The Origin Of Lightning
  • Putin And Xi Want To Achieve Immortality With Organ Transplants. Could They?
  • Love Leaf Peeping? Here’s The Best Places To Photograph Foliage In The US This Fall
  • What Happened During Flat-Earthers’ “Final Experiment” In Antarctica
  • “We’re Insisting That Brain Death Is Something That It Isn’t” – How Do We Determine Death?
  • Homo Naledi May Have Buried Its Dead After All, Peer Reviewer Accepts
  • Bathroom Scrollers Beware! Phone Use On The Toilet Could Up Your Risk Of Hemorrhoids By 46 Percent
  • Marsquakes Reveal A Solid Inner Core In The Red Planet
  • For The First Time Ever We Have A Complete Map Of Brain Activity, And It’s Dazzling
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version