• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Google Accused Of “Airbrushing” After Changing How It Calculates Your Flight’s Carbon Footprint

August 25, 2022 by Deborah Bloomfield

Google has been accused of “airbrushing” the air industry’s impact on climate change after it changed the way it calculates the carbon footprint of your flights. When you search for flights on the search engine, as well as displaying times and services, Google displays the average amount of carbon emissions pumped out by those flights. 

Prior to the update, an investigation by the BBC has found that a typical flight from Seattle to Paris would be shown to emit the equivalent of 1,070 kilograms (2,360 pounds) of carbon dioxide. After the update, the same flights would be calculated as emitting the equivalent of 521 kilograms (1,150 pounds) of CO2.

Why the difference? Since the model changed in July, it excludes the overall impacts on the environment produced by air travel. As well as the CO2 released into the atmosphere during flights, contrails help to trap heat, and nitrogen oxide emissions by aircraft also lead to increases in concentrations of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. The warming effect of air travel is not, therefore, a simple matter of calculating how much CO2 has been released. 

Studies have found that aviation is responsible for around 3.5 percent of human activities that contribute to climate change, despite its contribution of a lower 2.5 percent of global CO2 emissions. Google flights used to reflect this increased contribution to global warming in their tool, which they say is to help people make informed choices taking into account their climate impact. However, since July they have chosen to “focus on CO2 emissions”.

“Following recent discussions with academic and industry partners, we are adjusting the [flight tool] to focus on CO2 emissions,” Google wrote in a Github announcement. 

Advertisement

“While we strongly believe in including non-CO2 effects in the model long-term, the details of how and when to include these factors requires more input from our stakeholders as part of a governance model that’s in development. With this change, we are provisionally removing contrails effects from our CO2e estimates.”

Google went on to say that they believed these other factors were critical to the model, but that they wanted to incorporate factors like “time of day and regional variations in contrails’ warming impact”. They added that they were committed to providing customers with accurate information, so that they can make informed choices when traveling.

However, reacting to the change, chief scientist of Greenpeace, Dr Doug Parr, told the BBC that Google has “airbrushed a huge chunk of the aviation industry’s climate impacts from its pages”, while Professor David Lee of Manchester Metropolitan University – an expert on the contribution of air travel to the climate crisis – added that “it now significantly understates the global impact of aviation on the climate”.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Turkey, Egypt pledge further talks to normalise ties after 2nd round
  2. Business Canvas, a Korea-based document management SaaS company, closes $2.5M seed round
  3. Uber adjusts third-quarter forecast in light of increased gross bookings
  4. OSCE calls on Bosnia’s rival leaders to reform election law

Source Link: Google Accused Of "Airbrushing" After Changing How It Calculates Your Flight's Carbon Footprint

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • The Man Who Fell From Space: These Are The Last Words Of Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov
  • How Long Can A Bird Can Fly Without Landing?
  • Earliest Evidence Of Making Fire Has Been Discovered, X-Rays Of 3I/ATLAS Reveal Signature Unseen In Other Interstellar Objects, And Much More This Week
  • Could This Weirdly Moving Comet Have Been The Real “Star Of Bethlehem”?
  • How Monogamous Are Humans Vs. Other Mammals? Somewhere Between Beavers And Meerkats, Apparently
  • A 4,900-Year-Old Tree Called Prometheus Was Once The World’s Oldest. Then, A Scientist Cut It Down
  • Descartes Thought The Pineal Gland Was “The Seat Of The Soul” – And Some People Still Do
  • Want To Know What The Last 2 Minutes Before Being Swallowed By A Volcanic Eruption Look Like? Now You Can
  • The Three Norths Are Moving On: A Once-In-A-Lifetime Alignment Shifts This Weekend
  • Spectacular Photo Captures Two Rare Atmospheric Phenomena At The Same Time
  • How America’s Aerospace Defense Came To Track Santa Claus For 70 Years
  • 3200 Phaethon: Parent Body Of Geminids Meteor Shower Is One Of The Strangest Objects We Know Of
  • Does Sleeping On A Problem Actually Help? Yes – It’s Science-Approved
  • Scientists Find A “Unique Group” Of Polar Bears Evolving To Survive The Modern World
  • Politics May Have Just Killed Our Chances To See A Tom Cruise Movie Actually Shot In Space
  • Why Is The Head On Beer Often White, When Beer Itself Isn’t?
  • Fabric Painted With Dye Made From Bacteria Could Protect Astronauts From Radiation On Moon
  • There Used To Be 27 Letters In The English Alphabet, Until One Mysteriously Vanished
  • Why You Need To Stop Chucking That “Liquid Gold” Down Your Kitchen Sink
  • Youngest Mammoth Fossils Ever Found Turn Out To Be Whales… 400 Kilometers From The Coast
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version