• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Google Accused Of “Airbrushing” After Changing How It Calculates Your Flight’s Carbon Footprint

August 25, 2022 by Deborah Bloomfield

Google has been accused of “airbrushing” the air industry’s impact on climate change after it changed the way it calculates the carbon footprint of your flights. When you search for flights on the search engine, as well as displaying times and services, Google displays the average amount of carbon emissions pumped out by those flights. 

Prior to the update, an investigation by the BBC has found that a typical flight from Seattle to Paris would be shown to emit the equivalent of 1,070 kilograms (2,360 pounds) of carbon dioxide. After the update, the same flights would be calculated as emitting the equivalent of 521 kilograms (1,150 pounds) of CO2.

Why the difference? Since the model changed in July, it excludes the overall impacts on the environment produced by air travel. As well as the CO2 released into the atmosphere during flights, contrails help to trap heat, and nitrogen oxide emissions by aircraft also lead to increases in concentrations of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. The warming effect of air travel is not, therefore, a simple matter of calculating how much CO2 has been released. 

Studies have found that aviation is responsible for around 3.5 percent of human activities that contribute to climate change, despite its contribution of a lower 2.5 percent of global CO2 emissions. Google flights used to reflect this increased contribution to global warming in their tool, which they say is to help people make informed choices taking into account their climate impact. However, since July they have chosen to “focus on CO2 emissions”.

“Following recent discussions with academic and industry partners, we are adjusting the [flight tool] to focus on CO2 emissions,” Google wrote in a Github announcement. 

Advertisement

“While we strongly believe in including non-CO2 effects in the model long-term, the details of how and when to include these factors requires more input from our stakeholders as part of a governance model that’s in development. With this change, we are provisionally removing contrails effects from our CO2e estimates.”

Google went on to say that they believed these other factors were critical to the model, but that they wanted to incorporate factors like “time of day and regional variations in contrails’ warming impact”. They added that they were committed to providing customers with accurate information, so that they can make informed choices when traveling.

However, reacting to the change, chief scientist of Greenpeace, Dr Doug Parr, told the BBC that Google has “airbrushed a huge chunk of the aviation industry’s climate impacts from its pages”, while Professor David Lee of Manchester Metropolitan University – an expert on the contribution of air travel to the climate crisis – added that “it now significantly understates the global impact of aviation on the climate”.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Turkey, Egypt pledge further talks to normalise ties after 2nd round
  2. Business Canvas, a Korea-based document management SaaS company, closes $2.5M seed round
  3. Uber adjusts third-quarter forecast in light of increased gross bookings
  4. OSCE calls on Bosnia’s rival leaders to reform election law

Source Link: Google Accused Of "Airbrushing" After Changing How It Calculates Your Flight's Carbon Footprint

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Unexpected Discovery Hints We Might Be Inside A Black Hole
  • Why Are People Talking About This “Square Structure” Captured On Mars?
  • The World Has Five Oceans, Not Four – Discover The Latest One
  • Just 80 Percent Of People Can Perceive This Optical Illusion And No One Knows Why
  • Something Other Than Geological Processes Or Humans Created These Caves
  • Can Black Holes Lead To Other Places In The Universe?
  • The Devastating Communication Problem Facing Light-Speed Travel
  • The Great British Pet Massacre: One Of The Saddest Tragedies Of 1939
  • Would A Vacuum-Filled Balloon Float?
  • Queen Ant Produces Babies Of 2 Different Species, For The First Time Ever We Have A Complete Map Of Brain Activity, And Much More This Week
  • Yes, Your Attention Span Might Have Shortened, But That Might Not Be A Terrible Thing
  • This May Be The First Known Portrait Of A Viking – And It’s A Sexually Rampant “Beard Fondler”
  • The Largest Snake In Captivity Is A Humongous 7.7-Meter Reticulated Python Called Medusa
  • Poo Power: How Animal Dung Could Unlock New Antibiotic Treatments
  • Perfectly Preserved Dinosaur Tail Found Inside 99-Million-Year-Old Amber Was Mistaken For A Plant
  • Why Aren’t Full Photos Of The Milky Way Real? A NASA Analyst Explains The Obvious
  • Freaky Ratfish Have Teeth Growing Out Of Their Foreheads, And They Use Them For Love
  • The Largest Turtle Ever Known To Have Lived Was An Absolute Unit
  • “It Literally Leapt Out Of The Rock At Us”: How Violent Storms Led To The Extraordinary Preservation Of Baby Pterosaurs
  • This Is The Reason Why Earth’s Core Exists, And It’s More Interesting Than You Might Think
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version