• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Google tells court ‘staggering’ $5 billion EU antitrust fine flawed

September 30, 2021 by David Barret Leave a Comment

September 30, 2021

By Foo Yun Chee

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) – A 4.34 billion euro ($5 billion) European Union antitrust fine was based on flawed calculations, Alphabet’s Google said on Thursday, urging Europe’s second-highest court to scrap or reduce what it said was not an appropriate penalty.

Google was fined for using its Android mobile operating system to thwart rivals and cement its dominance in general internet search from 2011, in the largest penalty meted out to any company found guilty of breaching EU antitrust rules.

“The fine that was imposed, a staggering 4.34 billion euros, was not appropriate,” Google’s lawyer Genevra Forwood told the five-judge panel of the General Court on the fourth day of a week-long hearing, which is taking place three years after the European Commission sanctioned the company.

“The problem is not the headline-grabbing fine per se. The problem is how the Commission reached that figure,” she said.

Forwood said there was no anti-competitive intent in Google’s actions nor could it have known that its conduct was an abuse based on EU case law and there was no precedent for it.

“So it was wrong for the Commission to impose any fine at all, let alone turn up the dials to reach its biggest fine ever,” Forwood said.

She also took issue with the EU competition enforcer adding a 11% gravity factor to Google’s fine compared with 5% for Intel in 2009 in a separate case.

“Even if this Court considers that a fine is appropriate, it would only be proper to turn the dials right down,” she said.

However, the European Commission’s lawyer Anthony Dawes said Google “simply could not be unaware of the anti-competitive behaviour of its practices”.

“Infringements committed negligently are no less serious than those committed intentionally,” Dawes said, adding that the fine was just 4.5% of Google’s revenue in 2017 versus a 10% cap allowed under EU rules.

A verdict is likely to come next year. The case is T-604/18 Google vs European Commission

($1 = 1.1714 euros)

(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Alexander Smith)

Source Link Google tells court ‘staggering’ $5 billion EU antitrust fine flawed

David Barret
David Barret

Related posts:

  1. Caribbean tourism recovery punctured by new coronavirus spike
  2. China’s commerce ministry to follow through on consensus reached by Chinese, U.S. leaders
  3. VW’s SEAT to extend assembly curbs in Spain into 2022 on chip shortage
  4. Ecuador raises prison riot death toll to 30, still recovering bodies

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • Only 19 US States Require School Sex Education To Be Medically Accurate, Finds Sweeping Review
  • Do Any Frogs Or Toads Give Birth To Live Young? Just One: Meet The Western Nimba Toad
  • Tasmanian Tigers’ Genetics May Have Doomed Them Long Before Humans Came Along
  • Scientists “Wake Up” Ancient Life That’s Been Under The Seabed For 100 Million Years
  • Measurable Brain Changes Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Identified For The First Time
  • “It Was Really Unexpected”: Scientists Stunned By Glowing Plants, And All It Takes Is An Injection
  • Scientists Created Gene-Edited Albino Cane Frogs To Unravel The Mysteries Of Natural Selection
  • In Vivo Vs In Vitro: What Do They Actually Mean?
  • IFLScience The Big Questions: What Will The Fossils Of The Future Look Like?
  • Finally, A Successful Starship Launch – What This Means For The Moon Landings
  • 26 Years After Launch, The ISS Will Try A New Way To Stay In Orbit Next Month
  • The World Map As You Know It Is Misleading – Now Africa Wants To Change That
  • “It’s Totally Wacky”: Oldest Known Ankylosaur Had A Kind Of Armor Never Seen In Any Vertebrate – Living Or Extinct
  • “Lost City Of The Amazon” Wasn’t Destroyed By A Volcano After All
  • Why Do Hammerhead Sharks Have A Hammerhead?
  • Neanderthals In Iberia Had Funerary Practices – They’re Just Not What We Expected
  • Monochrome Rainbows: In The Right Circumstances, Rainbows Can Look Very Strange Indeed
  • Shark Teeth Are Losing Their Bite As Ocean Acidification Takes Hold
  • Wasp “Riding A Broomstick” Among Fantastic Finalists Of Wildlife Photographer Of The Year
  • Long-Lost Sailback Houndshark Not Seen Since 1973 Rediscovered In Papua New Guinea
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version