• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Men Probably Can’t Actually Smell When Women Are Most Fertile

July 24, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

Popular culture is full of scientific myths. No, the average person does not only use ten percent of their brain; sugar doesn’t make kids hyperactive; and your hair and fingernails don’t continue growing after you die. But there’s one in particular which, on the face of it, seems to have at least some scientific basis: the idea that men can tell when women are ovulating by their scent. 

Advertisement

It’s an idea that seems to pop up every decade or so. Here’s a study from 2020 that supports it, for example; here’s one from 2009 saying the same. Another study, this time from 2004, reiterates the idea;  here’s one from 2001 suggesting it’s true; you can even go all the way back to 1975 and find papers still saying the same thing. Men, it seems, can smell fertility in women.

But just how accurate is this factoid? According to the results of a new study, potentially not very: “Using frequent odor samples from the same women and hormonal assessment of fertility, we assessed potential fertility-related shifts in axillary body odor in a twofold study combining perceptual and chemical evidence,” write the authors. “Overall, there was no compelling evidence that female fertility positively affects male odor ratings.”

In fact, not only can men probably not pick up on the changes in a woman’s scent throughout her menstrual cycle, but those changes may not even exist at all: “The chemical composition of a woman’s axillary odor was not affected by her current fertile state,” the team discovered, or her “fluctuating ovarian hormone level.” 

All of this adds up to the question: where did this notion ever come from?

Well, one clue may be in the methodology of this study versus previous research. “In most studies, men assessed fertility information of one woman over her cycle, thus simulating repeated encounters with the same woman,” the authors explain. In contrast, the new study “aimed to investigate whether men are able to detect female fertility from a single encounter.”

Advertisement

To that end, the male participants in the study were given 24 odor samples to rate over two separate sessions. No man received a sample from the same woman twice; the samples were distributed completely randomly, and rotated around the room systematically until every man had sniffed every woman.

And the results, if anything, showed precisely the opposite of what you’d expect. “In contrast to our predictions, axillary odor was descriptively evaluated as both less attractive and less pleasant at higher conception risk,” the authors noted – though the effect was very weak. Overall, they concluded, “we found no compelling indication that men’s perception of female axillary odors varies with female fertility.”

But another reason for the discrepancy between previous studies and the new paper is even more basic. “The majority of [prior] evidence lacks a direct assessment of female reproductive hormones, reliable hormonal confirmation of ovulation and depicts considerable inconsistencies in estimating the fertile window,” the authors point out – or to put it another way: nobody actually checked if the women really were ovulating when they thought they were.

This paper, on the other hand, confirmed where in their fertility cycle female participants were via both urinary and saliva samples. Not only that, but the team utilized cutting-edge technology to objectively evaluate the women’s aromas: “Chemical profiles of women’s axillary odor, measured with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry […] were used to assess whether changes in the abundance of chemical compounds occur in association with female fertility,” they explain. 

Advertisement

Combine all this with the well-documented publication bias against null effects – that is to say, people aren’t that interested in reading studies that don’t tell them weird things like “men can smell when you’re ovulating” – and it basically adds up to a never-ending circle of confirmation bias. 

So, it may be true that men can subconsciously tell when a woman is ovulating – but not an unfamiliar woman, and not by her scent alone. All in all, the most we can conclude is “more research needed” – including, as the team points out, revisiting some of the old results that got us here in the first place.

“We are certainly still at the beginning of understanding the physiological interaction between the gradual fluctuations in fertility and ovarian hormones across the ovulatory cycle and women’s body odor,” the paper concludes. “We strongly encourage further disentangling the physiological basis as well as the social function of olfactory cues to female fertility in humans with the robust methods we have at hand.”

The study is published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Canada’s Conservatives pledge big spending, deficit reduction in election platform
  2. Evolito’s electric motors look set to take off in aerospace where YASA left off in automotive
  3. TWIS: Newly Discovered CRISPR-Like Systems May Be Used To Edit Human Genomes, Reconstructed Face Of 50,000-Year-Old Ancient Ancestor, And Much More This Week
  4. Can Peacocks Fly?

Source Link: Men Probably Can't Actually Smell When Women Are Most Fertile

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Not An Artist Impression – JWST’s Latest Image Both Wows And Solves Mystery Of Aging Star System
  • “We Were Genuinely Astonished”: Moss Spores Survive 9 Months In Space Before Successfully Reproducing Back On Earth
  • The US’s Surprisingly Recent Plan To Nuke The Moon In Search Of “Negative Mass”
  • 14,400-Year-Old Paw Prints Are World’s Oldest Evidence Of Humans Living Alongside Domesticated Dogs
  • The Tribe That Has Lived Deep Within The Grand Canyon For Over 1,000 Years
  • Finger Monkeys: The Smallest Monkeys In The World Are Tiny, Chatty, And Adorable
  • Atmospheric River Brings North America’s Driest Place 25 Percent Of Its Yearly Rainfall In A Single Day
  • These Extinct Ice Age Giant Ground Sloths Were Fans Of “Cannonball Fruit”, Something We Still Eat Today
  • Last Year’s Global Aurora-Sparking “Superstorm” Squashed Earth’s Plasmasphere To A Fifth Its Usual Size
  • Theia – The Giant Impactor That Formed The Moon – Assembled Closer To The Sun Than Earth Is Now
  • Testosterone And Body Odor May Quietly Influence How People Perceive The Social Status Of Men
  • There Have Been At Least 50 Incidents Of Spiders Capturing And Eating Bats (That We Know Of)
  • A “Very Old, Undisturbed Structure” May Have Been Discovered Beyond The Orbit Of Neptune, 43 AU From The Sun
  • NASA Finally Reveals Comet 3I/ATLAS Images From 8 Missions, Including First From Another Planet’s Surface
  • 360 Million Years Ago, Cleveland Was Home To A Giant Predatory Fish Unlike Anything Alive Today
  • Under RFK Jr, CDC Turns Against Scientific Consensus On Autism And Vaccines, Incorrectly Claiming Lack Of Evidence
  • Megalodon VS T. Rex: Who Had The Biggest Teeth?
  • The 100 Riskiest Decisions You’ll Likely Ever Make
  • Funky-Nosed “Pinocchio” Chameleons Get A Boost As They Turn Out To Be Multiple Species
  • The Leech Craze: The Medical Fad That Nearly Eradicated A Species
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version