• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Pigeons Might Make Good Art Critics – Yes, Really

November 22, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

Art critics of the world, look out – a pigeon might just be coming for your job. Well, if you’re in the business of deciding if a child’s artwork is good or bad at least, because that’s exactly what one scientist trained a bunch of pigeons to do.

Watanabe Shigeru, a Professor Emeritus in psychology at Keiō University, had previously shown that pigeons were able to tell the difference between paintings by Monet and Picasso; unsurprisingly, his team won an Ig Nobel Prize for this research back in 1995.

Advertisement

But what if pigeons were capable of going a step beyond discriminating between different painting styles? Could they tell the difference between “good” and “bad” paintings? With four pigeons, some food, and a bunch of children’s artwork photographed and uploaded to a computer, Watanabe set to finding out.

As deemed by a teacher, and then a group of 10 adult observers, 15 watercolor and pastel paintings by elementary schoolchildren were placed in the “good” set, and another 15 in the “bad” set.

Then began the training; the pigeons were shown the paintings on a computer screen and were rewarded with food if they pecked in response to a “good” painting. They didn’t receive a reward if they pecked at a “bad” one.

After an average of 22.5 sessions, all four pigeons were able to discriminate between a “good” and a “bad” painting. But surely they were just memorizing which pictures belong to which set, right? It seems not.

Advertisement

Watanabe followed up with other experiments, first by showing the pigeons pictures that they had never seen before – and the birds successfully pecked at those in the “good” group more often than the “bad” ones. The same thing happened when they were shown paintings that had been reduced in size.

The next step was to figure out what it was about the paintings that the pigeons were using to make the decision to peck or not. What Watanabe found “did not confirm which cues pigeons used for their discrimination of beauty,” the psychologist wrote, but when shown greyscale and mosaic versions of the paintings, the pigeons were less able to distinguish between the “good” and the “bad”. This, it’s suggested, might mean they use color and shape cues in their decision-making.

“Artistic endeavors have been long thought to be limited to humans, but this experiment shows that, with training, pigeons are capable of distinguishing between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ paintings,” said Watanabe in a statement. 

“This research does not deal with advanced artistic judgments, but it shows that pigeons are able to acquire the ability to judge beauty similar to that of humans.”

Advertisement

No word on whether the pigeons’ feedback was given to the children.

The study is published in Animal Cognition.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Tennis – Kerber defeats Stephens in the battle of the U.S. Open champs
  2. Turkey seeks 40 F-16 jets to upgrade Air Force -sources
  3. Puffins’ Fighting Side Gets Airtime In David Attenborough’s First UK Nature Series
  4. Jellyfish Are Capable Of Something Scientists Never Dreamed They Could Do

Source Link: Pigeons Might Make Good Art Critics – Yes, Really

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • What Is The Purpose Of Those Lines On Your Towels?
  • The Invisible World Around Us: How Can We Capture And Clean The Air We Breathe?
  • 85-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Eggs Dated Using “Atomic Clock For Fossils” For The First Time
  • Why Shouldn’t You Kiss Babies? New Study Shows Even Healthy Newborns Can Become Severely Ill With RSV
  • Earth Has A New Quasi-Moon – And It Has Probably Been Around For Decades
  • Want To Kill Your Prey? Do It Feather-Legged Lace Weaver Spider Style And Vomit All Over Them
  • IFLScience The Big Questions: Are We In The Anthropocene?
  • The Wildfire Paradox Affecting 440 Million People Has As Worrying A Solution As You’d Expect
  • AI May Infringe On Your Rights And Insult Your Dignity (Unless We Do Something Soon)
  • How Do You Study Cryptic Species? We’re Finally Lifting The Lid On The World’s Least Understood Mammals
  • Once-In-A-Decade Close Encounter With Hazardous Asteroid 2025 FA22 Approaches
  • With 229 Pairs, This Beautiful Animal Has The Highest Number Of Chromosomes Of Any Animal
  • “An Unimaginable Breakthrough”: Loudest-Ever Gravitational Wave Collision Proves Stephen Hawking Correct
  • Exciting Martian Mudstone Has Features That Might Be Considered Biosignatures
  • How Long Did Dinosaurs Live? “It’s A Big Surprise To People That Work On Them”
  • NASA’s Mysterious Announcement: “Clearest Sign Of Life That We’ve Ever Found On Mars”
  • New Brain Implant Can Decode Your Internal Monologue, Raising Fears Of Mind Reading
  • “Immediate, Sustained, And Devastating” Pain: The Most Venomous Mammal Packs An Extremely Nasty Sting
  • Domestic Cats Keeping Making Hybrids. That’s A Problem, And Yes – That Includes Some Pets
  • These Strange Little Lizards Have Toxic Green Blood, And No One Knows Exactly Why
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version