• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Pigeons Might Make Good Art Critics – Yes, Really

November 22, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

Art critics of the world, look out – a pigeon might just be coming for your job. Well, if you’re in the business of deciding if a child’s artwork is good or bad at least, because that’s exactly what one scientist trained a bunch of pigeons to do.

Watanabe Shigeru, a Professor Emeritus in psychology at Keiō University, had previously shown that pigeons were able to tell the difference between paintings by Monet and Picasso; unsurprisingly, his team won an Ig Nobel Prize for this research back in 1995.

Advertisement

But what if pigeons were capable of going a step beyond discriminating between different painting styles? Could they tell the difference between “good” and “bad” paintings? With four pigeons, some food, and a bunch of children’s artwork photographed and uploaded to a computer, Watanabe set to finding out.

As deemed by a teacher, and then a group of 10 adult observers, 15 watercolor and pastel paintings by elementary schoolchildren were placed in the “good” set, and another 15 in the “bad” set.

Then began the training; the pigeons were shown the paintings on a computer screen and were rewarded with food if they pecked in response to a “good” painting. They didn’t receive a reward if they pecked at a “bad” one.

After an average of 22.5 sessions, all four pigeons were able to discriminate between a “good” and a “bad” painting. But surely they were just memorizing which pictures belong to which set, right? It seems not.

Advertisement

Watanabe followed up with other experiments, first by showing the pigeons pictures that they had never seen before – and the birds successfully pecked at those in the “good” group more often than the “bad” ones. The same thing happened when they were shown paintings that had been reduced in size.

The next step was to figure out what it was about the paintings that the pigeons were using to make the decision to peck or not. What Watanabe found “did not confirm which cues pigeons used for their discrimination of beauty,” the psychologist wrote, but when shown greyscale and mosaic versions of the paintings, the pigeons were less able to distinguish between the “good” and the “bad”. This, it’s suggested, might mean they use color and shape cues in their decision-making.

“Artistic endeavors have been long thought to be limited to humans, but this experiment shows that, with training, pigeons are capable of distinguishing between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ paintings,” said Watanabe in a statement. 

“This research does not deal with advanced artistic judgments, but it shows that pigeons are able to acquire the ability to judge beauty similar to that of humans.”

Advertisement

No word on whether the pigeons’ feedback was given to the children.

The study is published in Animal Cognition.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Tennis – Kerber defeats Stephens in the battle of the U.S. Open champs
  2. Turkey seeks 40 F-16 jets to upgrade Air Force -sources
  3. Puffins’ Fighting Side Gets Airtime In David Attenborough’s First UK Nature Series
  4. Jellyfish Are Capable Of Something Scientists Never Dreamed They Could Do

Source Link: Pigeons Might Make Good Art Critics – Yes, Really

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Where On Earth Does Cinnamon Come From?
  • Born With No Feet, Andy The Goose Got Second-Chance Sneakers – But Murder Was Afoot
  • Where Does Pepper Come From?
  • 30-Cargo-300: Major Report Outlines The Priorities For A NASA-Led Human Mission To Mars
  • Like Cheesy Vomit: Why Does American Chocolate Taste So Weird To Europeans?
  • First Treasure From The “$17-Billion-Dollar” Gold-Laden Shipwreck Has Been Recovered
  • Never-Before-Seen Strain Of Mpox Virus Identified In England
  • “Starved To Death En Masse”: Populations Of Breeding Penguins Fall 95 Percent In Just A Few Years
  • Never-Before-Seen Black Hole Blast Clocked At Record-Breaking 60,000 Kilometers Per Second
  • Does This Ancient Egyptian Scroll Recount The World’s Oldest Magic Trick?
  • How Come Wild Animals Don’t Have Floppy Ears? The Clue Is In Your Dog
  • 25-Year-Old Paper On Controversial Glyphosate Weedkiller Retracted, After It Turns Out Monsanto Staff Helped Write It
  • Gravitational Lenses Confirm That Something Is Still Broken In The Universe
  • Adorable Camera Trap Footage Of Moms And Cubs Heralds Conservation Win For Sunda Tigers
  • Exercise VS Sleep: Which Is More Important When You Don’t Have Time For Both?
  • A Deep-Sea Mining Test Carved Up The Seabed. Two Years On, We’re Seeing Devastating Impacts
  • Enormous New Study Finds COVID-19 mRNA Shots Associated With 25 Percent Lower Risk Of Death From Any Cause
  • What Is The Best Movie Set In Space? We Asked Real-Life Astronauts To Find Out
  • Chernobyl’s Protective Shield Is Broken After A Drone Strike, Warns UN Nuclear Watchdog
  • Isaac Newton Was Born On Christmas Day – And January 4th
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version