• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Pigeons Might Make Good Art Critics – Yes, Really

November 22, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

Art critics of the world, look out – a pigeon might just be coming for your job. Well, if you’re in the business of deciding if a child’s artwork is good or bad at least, because that’s exactly what one scientist trained a bunch of pigeons to do.

Watanabe Shigeru, a Professor Emeritus in psychology at Keiō University, had previously shown that pigeons were able to tell the difference between paintings by Monet and Picasso; unsurprisingly, his team won an Ig Nobel Prize for this research back in 1995.

Advertisement

But what if pigeons were capable of going a step beyond discriminating between different painting styles? Could they tell the difference between “good” and “bad” paintings? With four pigeons, some food, and a bunch of children’s artwork photographed and uploaded to a computer, Watanabe set to finding out.

As deemed by a teacher, and then a group of 10 adult observers, 15 watercolor and pastel paintings by elementary schoolchildren were placed in the “good” set, and another 15 in the “bad” set.

Then began the training; the pigeons were shown the paintings on a computer screen and were rewarded with food if they pecked in response to a “good” painting. They didn’t receive a reward if they pecked at a “bad” one.

After an average of 22.5 sessions, all four pigeons were able to discriminate between a “good” and a “bad” painting. But surely they were just memorizing which pictures belong to which set, right? It seems not.

Advertisement

Watanabe followed up with other experiments, first by showing the pigeons pictures that they had never seen before – and the birds successfully pecked at those in the “good” group more often than the “bad” ones. The same thing happened when they were shown paintings that had been reduced in size.

The next step was to figure out what it was about the paintings that the pigeons were using to make the decision to peck or not. What Watanabe found “did not confirm which cues pigeons used for their discrimination of beauty,” the psychologist wrote, but when shown greyscale and mosaic versions of the paintings, the pigeons were less able to distinguish between the “good” and the “bad”. This, it’s suggested, might mean they use color and shape cues in their decision-making.

“Artistic endeavors have been long thought to be limited to humans, but this experiment shows that, with training, pigeons are capable of distinguishing between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ paintings,” said Watanabe in a statement. 

“This research does not deal with advanced artistic judgments, but it shows that pigeons are able to acquire the ability to judge beauty similar to that of humans.”

Advertisement

No word on whether the pigeons’ feedback was given to the children.

The study is published in Animal Cognition.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Tennis – Kerber defeats Stephens in the battle of the U.S. Open champs
  2. Turkey seeks 40 F-16 jets to upgrade Air Force -sources
  3. Puffins’ Fighting Side Gets Airtime In David Attenborough’s First UK Nature Series
  4. Jellyfish Are Capable Of Something Scientists Never Dreamed They Could Do

Source Link: Pigeons Might Make Good Art Critics – Yes, Really

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • A Giant Volcano Off The Coast Of Oregon Failed To Erupt On Time. Its New Schedule: 2026
  • Here Are 5 Ways In Which Cancer Treatment Advanced In 2025
  • The First Marine Mammal Driven To Extinction By Humans Disappeared Only 27 Years After Being Discovered
  • The Planet’s Oldest Bee Species Has Become The World’s First Insect To Be Granted Legal Rights
  • Facial Disfiguration: Why Has The Face Been The Target Of Punishment Across Time?
  • The World’s Largest Living Reptile Can “Surf” Over 10 Kilometers To Get Between Islands
  • In 1962, A Geologist Went Into A Cave. 2 Months Later, He’d Accidentally Invented A New Field Of Biology.
  • The Ancient Remains Of A 3-Ton Shark Indicate A New Point Of Origin For Gigantic Lamniform Sharks
  • The Biggest Landslide In Recorded History Happened Quite Recently And Pretty Close To Home
  • Meet The Amami Rabbit, A Goth Bunny That’s Also A Living Fossil
  • The Largest Native Terrestrial Animal In Antarctica Is Both Smaller And Tougher Than You’d Expect
  • The Freaky Reason Why You Should Never Store Tomatoes And Potatoes Together
  • Hominin Vs. Hominid: What’s The Difference?
  • Experimental Alzheimer’s Drug Could Have The Power To Halt Disease Before Symptoms Even Start
  • Al Naslaa: What Made This Enormous Boulder In Saudi Arabia Split In Two? Nobody’s Quite Sure
  • The Amazon Is Entering A “Hypertropical” Climate For The First Time In 10 Million Years
  • What Scientists Saw When They Peered Inside 190-Million-Year-Old Eggs And Recreated Some Of The World’s Oldest Dinosaur Embryos
  • Is 1 Dog Year Really The Same As 7 Human Years?
  • Were Dinosaur Eggs Soft Like A Reptile’s, Or Hard Like A Bird’s?
  • What Causes All The Symptoms Of Long COVID And ME/CFS? The Brainstem Could Be The Key
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2026 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version