• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Some Languages Don’t Clearly Express A Sense Of The Future, And It Skews The Way We See Reality

August 26, 2025 by Deborah Bloomfield

Many languages talk about the future in ways that are strikingly different from English. And whether we notice it or not, those differences may shape or reflect how we think, how we behave, and even the choices we make every day.

In English, there’s a hard future tense that marks what lies ahead, clearly separating it from the present: we say “It will rain tomorrow.” Many other languages lack such a clear-cut distinction, or at least have a much hazier distinction between now and what comes next.

In many other European languages, there is an optional element when referring to a future-time reference. For example, in German, you could use a future tense by saying “Es wird morgen regnen” (“It will rain tomorrow”). However, in day-to-day conversation, many German speakers just use the present tense with a time marker by saying “Morgen regnet es” (“Tomorrow it rains”). In this instance, the future is expressed without the need for a grammatical future tense.

It might seem like a tiny grammatical detail, but the choice of words carries weight. Saying “Tomorrow it rains”, as opposed to “It will rain tomorrow”, doesn’t merely swap one tense for another; it blurs the boundary between present and future. The event is spoken of as if it’s part of what is already unfolding, and that looser boundary subtly changes the way time itself is framed.

Other languages with a “weak” distinction between the past and future are Norwegian, Danish, Swedish, Dutch, Estonian, and Finnish. In Mandarin Chinese, there’s no dedicated future tense. Instead, the present tense is used with adverbs or context. When speaking about the weather forecast, speakers will say something that basically translates to “Tomorrow rain”. 

Remarkably, these grammatical quirks don’t just change how we talk; they may change or reflect how we think and act. Speakers of languages that do not have a strong future tense tend to make more future-oriented choices. For those individuals, it is as if the future feels closer; it is not seen as a distant, abstract concept. In other words, if your language treats the future as part of the present, you’re slightly more likely to act as if tomorrow matters today.

In 2013, Keith Chen, a behavioral economist at the Yale School of Management, carried out a study where he assessed how speakers of different languages face future-oriented decisions. To make more accurate comparisons, he studied individuals who had very similar levels of income, education, family structure, and country of birth, but who spoke different languages within the same country.

The finding showed that people whose languages blur the line between present and future were strikingly more future-minded in their behavior. Compared to speakers of languages that sharply separate today from tomorrow, they were 31 percent more likely to save money in any given year, entered retirement with 39 percent more wealth, were 24 percent less likely to smoke, 29 percent more likely to stay physically active, and 13 percent less likely to be obese.

However, the nature of this relationship isn’t totally clear. Chen writes in the conclusion of the paper: “One important issue in interpreting these results is the possibility that language is not causing but rather reflecting deeper differences that drive savings behavior.” 

“Self-reported measures of savings as a cultural value appear to drive savings behavior, yet are completely uncorrelated with the effect of language on savings. That is to say, while both language and cultural values appear to drive savings behavior, these measured effects do not appear to interact with each other in a way you would expect if they were both markers of some common causal factor,” he wrote.

“Nevertheless, the possibility that language acts only as a powerful marker of some deeper driver of intertemporal preferences cannot be completely ruled out,” he concludes.

This is only one way language may shape our sense of space and time. Other studies have shown that people who use a written system arranged from left to right – like English and many other European languages – tend to lay out time as proceeding from left to right when thinking abstractly. Conversely, people who use languages from right to left – like Arabic, Hebrew, and others – arrange time from right to left. 

It’s not always easy to appreciate when chatting away or typing a message on screen, but language is a hidden force shaping how we experience reality. Exploring ideas like these is a good way to challenge your preconceptions and remind yourself that your way of seeing the world isn’t set in stone.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Microsoft wants cloud computing to reshape natural disaster modeling, but challenges remain
  2. Chanel strikes playful note for spring
  3. Roman Military Camps In Arabia Spotted Using Google Earth, Suggesting Desert Conquest
  4. The Ancient “Wheel Of Ghosts” Has Turned 40 Meters Since It Was Built 5,000 Years Ago

Source Link: Some Languages Don't Clearly Express A Sense Of The Future, And It Skews The Way We See Reality

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • The Latest Internet Debate: Is It More Efficient To Walk Around On Massive Stilts?
  • The Trump Administration Wants To Change The Endangered Species Act – Here’s What To Know
  • That Iconic Lion Roar? Turns Out, They Have A Whole Other One That We Never Knew About
  • What Are Gravity Assists And Why Do Spacecraft Use Them So Much?
  • In 2026, Unique Mission Will Try To Save A NASA Telescope Set To Uncontrollably Crash To Earth
  • Blue Origin Just Revealed Its Latest New Glenn Rocket And It’s As Tall As SpaceX’s Starship
  • What Exactly Is The “Man In The Moon”?
  • 45,000 Years Ago, These Neanderthals Cannibalized Women And Children From A Rival Group
  • “Parasocial” Announced As Word Of The Year 2025 – Does It Describe You? And Is It Even Healthy?
  • Why Do Crocodiles Not Eat Capybaras?
  • Not An Artist Impression – JWST’s Latest Image Both Wows And Solves Mystery Of Aging Star System
  • “We Were Genuinely Astonished”: Moss Spores Survive 9 Months In Space Before Successfully Reproducing Back On Earth
  • The US’s Surprisingly Recent Plan To Nuke The Moon In Search Of “Negative Mass”
  • 14,400-Year-Old Paw Prints Are World’s Oldest Evidence Of Humans Living Alongside Domesticated Dogs
  • The Tribe That Has Lived Deep Within The Grand Canyon For Over 1,000 Years
  • Finger Monkeys: The Smallest Monkeys In The World Are Tiny, Chatty, And Adorable
  • Atmospheric River Brings North America’s Driest Place 25 Percent Of Its Yearly Rainfall In A Single Day
  • These Extinct Ice Age Giant Ground Sloths Were Fans Of “Cannonball Fruit”, Something We Still Eat Today
  • Last Year’s Global Aurora-Sparking “Superstorm” Squashed Earth’s Plasmasphere To A Fifth Its Usual Size
  • Theia – The Giant Impactor That Formed The Moon – Assembled Closer To The Sun Than Earth Is Now
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version