• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Study Links Frequent AI Use With Lower Critical Thinking Abilities

January 15, 2025 by Deborah Bloomfield

A new study investigating artificial intelligence (AI) and “cognitive offloading” by humans has found a negative correlation between frequent AI use and critical thinking abilities.

Advertisement

Large language models have become more freely available these days, whether it’s OpenAI’s ChatGPT or Google’s AI summaries, providing (often not entirely accurate) answers at potentially huge costs to the environment. Like pretty much all leaps in technology before it, from television to the Internet, researchers are interested in studying the impact it has on its users.

Advertisement

One particular aspect, looked at by Michael Gerlich at SBS Swiss Business School in Zurich, Switzerland, is the idea of cognitive offloading.

“Cognitive offloading occurs when individuals delegate cognitive tasks to external aids, reducing their engagement in deep, reflective thinking,” Gerlich explains in the study. “This phenomenon is particularly concerning in the context of critical thinking, which requires active cognitive engagement to analyse and evaluate information effectively.”

Just as studies have shown people may “rely on the Internet as a source of knowledge rather than remembering it for themselves” after the rise of Google, the concern is that people might begin to offload their own critical thinking abilities. Instead, they may rely on AI tools to perform some of these tasks, for example using ChatGPT to do school/college work, though there is little evidence that this is having much of an impact yet.

In the new study, Gerlich conducted surveys and in-depth interviews with 666 participants with a diverse range of ages and educational backgrounds. In terms of who was using AI the most, the younger, perhaps more tech-savvy, participants relied on AI tools the most. Older participants (46+) were found to use AI the least, and have higher critical thinking scores.

Advertisement

“Younger participants exhibited higher dependence on AI tools and lower critical thinking scores compared to older participants,” Gerlich wrote. “Furthermore, higher educational attainment was associated with better critical thinking skills, regardless of AI usage. These results highlight the potential cognitive costs of AI tool reliance, emphasising the need for educational strategies that promote critical engagement with AI technologies.”

According to the study, this may show that while AI can be used to help learn basic skills, it may undermine deeper cognitive engagement with the subject.

“Our findings indicate that cognitive offloading significantly mediates the relationship between AI usage and critical thinking, suggesting that the reduction in cognitive load may lead to diminished opportunities for cognitive engagement and critical analysis,” the study continued. 

Gerlich stresses that while an avenue to explore, the study relied on self-reported measures, and further study is needed, including experiments. Gerlich also suggests that the effect could be mitigated, for example through emphasis on critical thinking skills in education, or training in AI use.

Advertisement

“While cognitive offloading can enhance efficiency and reduce mental strain, it also affects cognitive development and critical thinking,” he added. “Excessive reliance on external aids may lead to a decline in internal cognitive abilities, such as memory retention and critical analysis skills.”

The study is published in the journal Societies.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Interactive Brokers launches cryptocurrency trading
  2. Motor racing-Title battle too close for comfort, says Mercedes boss Wolff
  3. Philippines’ registration for president closes without Duterte’s daughter
  4. JWST Spots Signs Of Earth-Like Atmosphere Around The Best Planet To Look For Life

Source Link: Study Links Frequent AI Use With Lower Critical Thinking Abilities

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • The World’s Oldest Known Cake Is Over 4,000 Years Old, And It Sounds Pretty Delicious
  • An Ominous Haze Lurks Over The Deadliest Volcano In US, But USGS Says A Repeat Of 1980 Isn’t Coming
  • Hayabusa2’s Target Asteroid Is 4 Times Smaller Than Thought – Can It Still Touch Down On It?
  • In 2011, Slavc The Wolf Journeyed 1,000 Miles To Begin Verona’s First Wolf Pack In 100 Years
  • Anyone Know What These Marine “Y-Larvae” Grow Into? Because Scientists Have No Clue
  • C/2025 A6 (Lemmon) Closest Earth Approach Is Next Month – Will We See It With The Naked Eye?
  • In 2013, A Volcanic Eruption Wiped Out Life On This Remote Island. Then, Somehow, Plants Reemerged
  • 1-Year-Old Orca Takes Out A Big Fat Seal In This Award-Winning – And Extremely Badass – Photo
  • Saturn And Neptune Will Reach Their Brightest In Days – And Look For Saturn’s Temporary Beauty Spot
  • Reindeer Bring A Gift Greater Than Any Of Santa’s – Hope Of A Stable Climate
  • If Deep-Sea Pressure Can Crush A Human Body, How Do Deep-Sea Creatures Not Implode?
  • Meet Ned: The Lonely Lefty Snail Looking For Love
  • “America Will Lead The Next Giant Leap”: NASA Announces New Milestone In Hunt For Exoplanets
  • What Did Neanderthals Sound Like?
  • One Star System Could Soon Dazzle Us Twice With Nova And Supernova Explosions
  • Unethical Experiments: When Scientists Really Should Have Stopped What They Were Doing Immediately
  • The First Humans Were Hunted By Leopards And Weren’t The Apex Predators We Thought They Were
  • Earth’s Passage Through The Galaxy Might Be Written In Its Rocks
  • What Is An Einstein Cross – And Why Is The Latest One Such A Unique Find?
  • If We Found Life On Mars, What Would That Mean For The Fermi Paradox And The Great Filter?
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version