• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

The US Army Once Spent Billions On Pixel Camouflage That Didn’t Work

March 14, 2023 by Deborah Bloomfield

War is a lucrative business, which also means that mistakes can be costly. One of the priciest screw-ups in recent military history comes from the US army, which reportedly wasted heaps of dollars developing a stylish-looking new camouflage, only to discover it didn’t effectively hide their soldiers. 

The Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP) was designed in 2004, taking “inspiration” from the pixelated pattern from the computer-generated camouflage of the Canadian Armed Forces (called CADPAT). 

Advertisement

Using grey, beige, and green square pixels, the idea was that the pattern hid people in all warfare environments, whether it be urban streets, forests, or deserts. Since the US was currently at war with Iraq and Afghanistan, it was especially important that it concealed soldiers in harsh, arid environments. 

Unfortunately, it didn’t. While the digital camo excelled through lab tests and selection processes, there’s no evidence that the UCP had ever undergone field testing before it was rolled out in 2004/2005. 

US soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan quickly started to question the effectiveness of the UCP, arguing that the new camouflage was actually making them stand out against their enemies. 

A sample of material with Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP).
A sample of material with Universal Camouflage Pattern (UCP). Image credit: Doubleailes via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

It turned out, the design failed to consider an optical effect known as “isoluminance”.

Advertisement

If human eyes are shown visual stimuli from a distance that have sharp variations in colour without any contrasts in lightness – such as a pixelated pattern made of just three different colors – then we tend to just perceive the patterns as a single mass. In other words, from a distance, the pixels just blurred into a single blob that stuck out against the surrounding environment.

As the War in Afghanistan stumbled along, criticism towards UCP mounted. In 2012, a government watchdog reportedly issued “a scathing report” against the pixel camo, arguing it put troops at risk and had potentially wasted $5 billion of taxpayers’ money. 

By 2014, the US Army announced it was discontinuing the UCP, replacing it with the new Operational Camouflage Pattern by the end of September 2019. Unlike the UCP, the updated Operational Camouflage Pattern was part of a “family” of camouflage with different color palettes, including a dark variant for jungle-woodland environments and a lighter pattern for arid climates.

The moral of the story: the digital-print camo might have looked slick, but its promise of being a “universal” uniform was overstretched. 

Advertisement

This wasn’t the only costly uniform blunder that occurred during the years of the Afghanistan War, however. As part of their effort to train up Afghanistan’s security forces after invading the country, the US reportedly overspent $28 million on the new uniforms of the Afghan National Army.

The reason for the waste of money was that the Afghan minister of defense, Abdul Rahim Wardak, picked a forested camouflage without acknowledging that Afghanistan is pretty damn dry. 

“They picked the pattern based on a fashion preference, not by experts,” said John F Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction

“That was a dumb decision.”

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. India’s economic growth will remain strong in coming quarters, S&P says
  2. Bitcoin attempts recovery as Evergrande-led selloff eases
  3. More evacuations as lava gushes from Canaries volcano
  4. Summit Partners raises $8.35 billion for eleventh U.S. growth equity fund

Source Link: The US Army Once Spent Billions On Pixel Camouflage That Didn't Work

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Are There Colors That Only Exist In Our Brains? Find Out More In Issue 35 Of CURIOUS – Out Now
  • If They Take Fluoride Out Of The Water, What Could Happen To Americans’ Teeth?
  • Paraglider Accidentally Flies Into The “Death Zone” 8,500 Meters Up – And Survives
  • World’s Oldest Fingerprint, Bioacoustics Could Give Us “A Peek Into The Language Of Wolves”, And Much More This Week
  • Please Stop Jamming Coins Into The Rocky Cracks Of Legendary Giant’s Causeway
  • We’re A Step Closer To Knowing Who Made The Earliest Known Stone Tools
  • These Little Birds Are All But Extinct – But There Is Still Time To Save Them
  • The Three Types Of Female Orgasm
  • Elon Musk Has Announced His Bombastic Plan To Get Humans To Mars
  • China Unveils World’s Largest Offshore Wind Turbine With Hub Height Of 185 Meters
  • Oldest Fingerprint, AI Decoding Wolf Language, And Injecting Life On Other Worlds?
  • “There Are Glimmers Of Hope”: Search For One Of The World’s Most Endangered Pigeons Just Scored A Big Win
  • Earth Has A 1-In-100,000 Chance Of Being Ejected From The Solar System Due To A Passing Star
  • “Necrobotics” Turns Dead Spider Corpses Into Biohybrid Robots
  • Why Even Traveling Close To The Speed Of Light Is So Hard
  • Peer Into The Universe’s Distant Past Thanks To JWST’s Longest-Exposure Photo Yet
  • First Evidence For Chubby Cheeks In Dinosaurs Challenges Our Understanding Of How They Chewed
  • The 2021 “Heat Dome” Killed Her Mother. Now, She’s Suing The Oil Companies Responsible
  • Two Of The Most Destructive Termites Got It On, Sparking Hybrid Threat In Florida
  • The Mad Gasser of Mattoon: A Story Of Anxiety And Hysteria In America’s Heartland
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version