• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

This Physicist Has Written Over 1,750 Wikipedia Articles To Help Fix Sexism In STEM

October 21, 2022 by Deborah Bloomfield

There are more than 1.5 million biographical articles on Wikipedia, covering the lives of some of history’s most notable scientists, inventors, politicians, artists, and so on. It’s undeniably a vast number – but out of those 1.5 million, less than 285,000 are about women. Even fewer are estimated to be about non-white people. And even those who do manage to squeeze in among the hordes of white Western men aren’t guaranteed a permanent spot in Wikipedia’s repository: articles about women and people of color are less likely to be added to and improved, less likely to be read, and notably more likely to be deleted when they don’t link to other pages.

That’s why Jessica Wade, a British physicist specializing in Raman spectroscopy of polymer-based organic light-emitting diodes, has taken things into her own hands – literally. She’s personally written more than 1,750 articles for the online encyclopedia, in a singularly impressive attempt to redress the biographical balance for female and minority scientists and engineers.

Advertisement

“[Wikipedia is] used by pretty much everyone,” Wade told the Washington Post earlier this week. “[But] despite it being this incredibly important resource, it… suffer[s] from a lack of content, particularly about women, but also about people of color.”

It’s a big job, and often a thankless one: Wade has had dozens of articles deleted or flagged as failing the website’s longstanding “notability” criteria.

@Wikipedia editor who spent their wednesday night tagging the recent biographies i’ve started for #WomenInSTEM as not notable enough to be included in the encyclopaedia. it’s really constructive and helpful work. 🤬😭 pic.twitter.com/dHPOWTRdLO— Dr Jess Wade 👩🏻‍🔬 (@jesswade)

Yet, as others have pointed out, the definition of “notable” seems to be somewhat laxer for men than for other genders. Take Clarice Phelps, the nuclear chemist recognized as the first Black woman to be involved with the discovery of a chemical element: her profile was marked for deletion within a few months of Wade creating it.

Advertisement

And even more notorious, though not one of Wade’s creations, was the case of Donna Strickland, a literal Nobel Prize winning physicist who was deemed not notable enough for a Wikipedia article right up until an hour and a half after her Prize was awarded.

Many more, though, are Wikipedia success stories. Wade’s biographies include climatologist Kim Cobb; mathematician and Air Force Space and Missile Pioneers Hall of Fame inductee Gladys West; physicist June Lindsey, who was influential in the discovery of DNA; Ijeoma Uchegbu, a pioneer in pharmaceutical nanoscience; and vaccinologist Sarah Gilbert, who helped develop the Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

“The process is finding people first – usually it’s an award holder, someone who’s been given a fellowship, someone who’s published a really great paper, or somebody who’s done a recent really good talk. Every morning, I go on Twitter and I’ll look,” Wade told the New York Times in 2019.

Advertisement

“Then I check if they meet the notability criteria on Wikipedia,” she explained. “And then I do a bunch of research, and I write as I go. So I’ll have like 20 tabs open with all different aspects of their career and then start to stitch together a biography from that.”

But even here, there can be problems. The gender and racial bias among Wikipedia articles isn’t just a Wikipedia issue, Wade explains: Phelps, for example, played a crucial part in the discovery of tennessine, but was left out of official announcements and publicity about the result. 

“Without these crucial pieces of recognition, her biography was quickly deemed not appropriate for Wikipedia,” Wade and molecular biologist Maryam Zaringhalam wrote in 2019.

Advertisement

Despite these stumbling blocks, the road ahead looks hopeful. With initiatives like Women in Red, AfroCROWD, and edit-a-thons focused on female and minority figures, the number of biographies of previously-overlooked scientists is slowly but surely ticking upwards.

“Through the efforts of Dr. Jess Wade and other volunteer contributors, real progress is being made,” Anusha Alikhan, vice president of communications at the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts Wikipedia, told the Washington Post. “In the past three years the percentage of biographies on English Wikipedia that are about women has increased from 15 to 19 percent.” 

“That may seem like a small change,” Alikhan said, “yet it represents more than 75,000 new biographies about women.”

Advertisement

As for Wade – she’s still writing those biographies. “I truly love seeing people being recognized and honored,” she told the Post. And in a particularly meta twist, she’s now a member of the very group she’s been working to promote: as of February 2018, she is a female scientist with her own Wikipedia page. 

She hasn’t let it go to her head, though. “I’m a tiny fish in a massive sea,” she told the Post. “I’ll keep doing everything I can to make science a more accessible and inclusive place to be.”

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. U.S. trade chief sees ‘difficult logistical challenges’ for WTO summit
  2. Alpha Medical closes $24M Series B round to expand women’s telehealth – without the video calls
  3. Mexico’s Kavak drives away with $700M in new funding, doubling its valuation to $8.7B
  4. How to claim a student discount for TechCrunch+

Source Link: This Physicist Has Written Over 1,750 Wikipedia Articles To Help Fix Sexism In STEM

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Project Hail Mary Trailer First Look: What Would Happen If The Sun Got Darker?
  • Newly Discovered Cell Structure Might Hold Key To Understanding Devastating Genetic Disorders
  • What Is Kakeya’s Needle Problem, And Why Do We Want To Solve It?
  • “I Wasn’t Prepared For The Sheer Number Of Them”: Cave Of Mummified Never-Before-Seen Eyeless Invertebrates Amazes Scientists
  • Asteroid Day At 10: How The World Is More Prepared Than Ever To Face Celestial Threats
  • What Happened When A New Zealand Man Fell Butt-First Onto A Powerful Air Hose
  • Ancient DNA Confirms Women’s Unexpected Status In One Of The Oldest Known Neolithic Settlements
  • Earth’s Weather Satellites Catch Cloud Changes… On Venus
  • Scientists Find Common Factors In People Who Have “Out-Of-Body” Experiences
  • Shocking Photos Reveal Extent Of Overfishing’s Impact On “Shrinking” Cod
  • Direct Fusion Drive Could Take Us To Sedna During Its Closest Approach In 11,000 Years
  • Earth’s Energy Imbalance Is More Than Double What It Should Be – And We Don’t Know Why
  • We May Have Misjudged A Fundamental Fact About The Cambrian Explosion
  • The Shoebill Is A Bird So Bizarre That Some People Don’t Even Believe It’s Real
  • Colossal’s “Dire Wolves” Are Now 6 Months Old – And They’ve Doubled In Size
  • How To Fake A Fossil: Find Out More In Issue 36 Of CURIOUS – Out Now
  • Is It True Earth Used To Take 420 Days To Orbit The Sun?
  • One Of The Ocean’s “Most Valuable Habitats” Grows The Only Flowers Known To Bloom In Seawater
  • World’s Largest Digital Camera Snaps 2,104 New Asteroids In 10 Hours, Mice With 2 Dads Father Their Own Offspring, And Much More This Week
  • Simplest Explanation For “Anomalous” Signals Coming From Underneath Antarctica Ruled Out
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version