• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Trust In Science Remains High Across The World

January 22, 2025 by Deborah Bloomfield

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been wide-scale concerns that science is experiencing a public trust crisis. The rise of misinformation and conspiracy theories, as well as criticisms from high-profile individuals, has led to the idea that science and scientists have lost the confidence of large numbers of people. However, recent research has demonstrated that this may not be the case; the narrative of a crisis in public trust is not supported by the evidence, the authors of a new study say.

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

In the last year or so, several surveys have demonstrated that the public confidence in scientists in the US remains high, despite there being a partisan divide. But what about the rest of the world? Well, according to a new massive global survey involving a team of 241 researchers, public trust remains moderately high in many countries. 

This research represents the largest post-pandemic study of trust in science, societal expectations, and public views on research priorities since the pandemic.  

“Our results show that most people in most countries have a relatively high level of trust in scientists and want them to play an active role in society and politics”, principal investigator Dr Viktoria Cologna explained in a statement.  

In total, the researchers surveyed 71,922 people across 68 countries, including many under-researched countries in the Global South.

“This project showcases the importance and power of big team science to answer fundamental questions about human behaviour. By pooling our expertise and resources, we were able to reach over 70,000 people and improve sample diversity and representation by recruiting from 68 countries,” study co-author Dr Charlotte Pennington, a senior lecturer at Aston University School of Psychology, said in another statement.

The research showed that, across this population, the majority of the public had a relatively high level of trust in scientists – the mean trust level was 3.62, on a scale of 1 = very low trust to 5 = very high trust. The majority of respondents (78 percent) also saw scientists as qualified, honest (57 percent), and concerned about public well-being (56 percent).

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

“Overall, the study resulted in an optimistic finding – that people generally trust scientists and agree that they should engage more in society and policymaking. Such trust is important because it allows people to make research-informed decisions about their own lives,” Pennington continued.

Despite this positive result, there are some areas of concern that should not be ignored. Firstly, across the world, just under half of the respondents (42 percent) believed scientists pay attention to the views of others.

“Our results also show that many people in many countries feel that the priorities of science are not always well aligned with their own priorities,” co-author Dr Niels G. Mede added. “We recommend that scientists take these results seriously and find ways to be more receptive to feedback and open to dialogue with the public.”

The findings also confirm similar ones found in the previous study on the US that suggest a divide of opinions across the political divide. Those with right-wing political views in Western countries tended to have less trust in scientists than those with left-wing views. This indicates that attitudes towards science are polarized along political lines, but this was only in specific cases. In most countries, there was no correlation between political orientation and trust in science.

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

Another point that was more politically polarized in the US context was the views on the role scientists should play in society and policy making. Globally, 83 percent of respondents believed that scientists should communicate with the public about science. This could represent an important incentive for increased science communication efforts.

In addition, only 23 percent believed scientists should stay out of public policy debates by not advocating for specific policies. In contrast, 52 percent believed scientists should be more involved in policy-making.

What areas did people feel scientists should be focusing their research on? Well, it seems participants believed researchers should prioritize solving energy issues, reducing poverty, and improving public health. Defence developments and research into military technology were given lower priority – in fact, participants indicated that scientists are already putting too much work into these latter two areas.

“This research demonstrates that people from all around the globe still have high trust in science and want scientists involved in policymaking,” study co-author Dr James Reynolds, a senior lecturer at Aston University School of Psychology, said. “When we face great challenges, such as threats to public health or energy crises, the public recognize the importance that scientists can play and want us involved. This is also true of the UK where levels of public trust in science is one of the highest globally.”

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

The paper is published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Analysis-Argentina primary defeat puts Peronists in tough spot on policy
  2. Facebook puts Instagram Kids on hold amid criticism of planned app
  3. China Evergrande’s offshore bond default imminent; bondholders’ advisor says
  4. JWST Spots Signs Of Earth-Like Atmosphere Around The Best Planet To Look For Life

Source Link: Trust In Science Remains High Across The World

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • The Cavendish Experiment: In 1797, Henry Cavendish Used Two Small Metal Spheres To Weigh The Entire Earth
  • People Are Only Now Learning Where The Titanic Actually Sank
  • A New Way Of Looking At Einstein’s Equations Could Reveal What Happened Before The Big Bang
  • First-Ever Look At Neanderthal Nasal Cavity Shatters Expectations, NASA Reveals Comet 3I/ATLAS Images From 8 Missions, And Much More This Week
  • The Latest Internet Debate: Is It More Efficient To Walk Around On Massive Stilts?
  • The Trump Administration Wants To Change The Endangered Species Act – Here’s What To Know
  • That Iconic Lion Roar? Turns Out, They Have A Whole Other One That We Never Knew About
  • What Are Gravity Assists And Why Do Spacecraft Use Them So Much?
  • In 2026, Unique Mission Will Try To Save A NASA Telescope Set To Uncontrollably Crash To Earth
  • Blue Origin Just Revealed Its Latest New Glenn Rocket And It’s As Tall As SpaceX’s Starship
  • What Exactly Is The “Man In The Moon”?
  • 45,000 Years Ago, These Neanderthals Cannibalized Women And Children From A Rival Group
  • “Parasocial” Announced As Word Of The Year 2025 – Does It Describe You? And Is It Even Healthy?
  • Why Do Crocodiles Not Eat Capybaras?
  • Not An Artist Impression – JWST’s Latest Image Both Wows And Solves Mystery Of Aging Star System
  • “We Were Genuinely Astonished”: Moss Spores Survive 9 Months In Space Before Successfully Reproducing Back On Earth
  • The US’s Surprisingly Recent Plan To Nuke The Moon In Search Of “Negative Mass”
  • 14,400-Year-Old Paw Prints Are World’s Oldest Evidence Of Humans Living Alongside Domesticated Dogs
  • The Tribe That Has Lived Deep Within The Grand Canyon For Over 1,000 Years
  • Finger Monkeys: The Smallest Monkeys In The World Are Tiny, Chatty, And Adorable
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version