• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

US Government Sexually Teased WW1 Soldiers To Make Them Fight Harder, Study Finds

November 8, 2022 by Deborah Bloomfield

The US government may have sexually “teased” soldiers in the First World War in an attempt to get them to fight harder, argues a paper published by Cambridge historian Eric Wycoff Rogers. Yep, it really is as strange as it sounds.  

In 1914, war breaks out in Europe. Austria-Hungary declares war on Serbia and Germany invades Luxembourg and Belgium, while Allied nations gather their forces to hold off the assault. The United States remain neutral on the matter, with local soldiers largely uninterested in fighting a war halfway across the world against little threat to their sovereignty.

Advertisement

However, a U-boat attack and whisperings that Germany attempted to persuade Mexico to invade the US prompted a quick reversal, and the nation entered the fray in 1917. While the interests of national and global security were enough to convince politicians to enter the Allied side, soldiers leaving the comfort of their homes to enter one of the bloodiest wars in history were not so easily sold. 

“The war didn’t feel relevant to young American men in the way it did to European men,” Rogers, author of the study, said in a statement. 

“Particularly after President Wilson’s sudden U-turn on American belligerency, the government had to work hard to convince civilians to support the war, and this was doubly true for soldiers, many of whom were drafted against their will.” 

Advertisement

So, the US government devised a plan. According to Rogers, they believed that sexually fulfilled men had too much mental fortitude to be motivated for such a war, and they would instead have to whittle them down through unmet sexual desires to make them fight their best.

They could have tried money or something else first, but sure let’s just jump straight to sexual teasing. 

To do so, the soldiers would be exposed to carefully controlled stimulation but forced to remain abstinent. Attractive female canteen staff were recruited, civilian women were invited to dance for the soldiers, the soldiers were encouraged to write to women back home, and sexual propaganda flooded their view. Any “promiscuous” women on the force were detained to prevent the men from getting any gratification. 

Advertisement

At the center of this bizarre attempt to prevent post-nut clarity was the Commission on Training Camp Activities (CTCA), which originally sought to control the force’s sex lives to prevent health troubles. Rogers’ new study, however, demonstrates it was instead an attempt to have power over the soldiers. 

Did it work? Well, the US was a huge help to the Allies, mostly in the form of material supplies to the front line. There were significant casualties, with 116,000 military deaths and 200,000 wounded on the US side, but these paled in comparison to other allied nations. America was only involved in the war for a brief stint, and it is unclear how much their longing for sex really impacted their success – if anything, it likely just made them really, really want to go home. 

The study was published in the Journal of the History of Sexuality.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Point raises $46.5 million for its premium debit card
  2. Onin is trying to fix event planning by combining calendar and chat
  3. Australia says return of French ambassador to aid repair of bilateral relationship
  4. Tennis-Gauff urges Raducanu not to focus on social media

Source Link: US Government Sexually Teased WW1 Soldiers To Make Them Fight Harder, Study Finds

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • A New Way Of Looking At Einstein’s Equations Could Reveal What Happened Before The Big Bang
  • First-Ever Look At Neanderthal Nasal Cavity Shatters Expectations, NASA Reveals Comet 3I/ATLAS Images From 8 Missions, And Much More This Week
  • The Latest Internet Debate: Is It More Efficient To Walk Around On Massive Stilts?
  • The Trump Administration Wants To Change The Endangered Species Act – Here’s What To Know
  • That Iconic Lion Roar? Turns Out, They Have A Whole Other One That We Never Knew About
  • What Are Gravity Assists And Why Do Spacecraft Use Them So Much?
  • In 2026, Unique Mission Will Try To Save A NASA Telescope Set To Uncontrollably Crash To Earth
  • Blue Origin Just Revealed Its Latest New Glenn Rocket And It’s As Tall As SpaceX’s Starship
  • What Exactly Is The “Man In The Moon”?
  • 45,000 Years Ago, These Neanderthals Cannibalized Women And Children From A Rival Group
  • “Parasocial” Announced As Word Of The Year 2025 – Does It Describe You? And Is It Even Healthy?
  • Why Do Crocodiles Not Eat Capybaras?
  • Not An Artist Impression – JWST’s Latest Image Both Wows And Solves Mystery Of Aging Star System
  • “We Were Genuinely Astonished”: Moss Spores Survive 9 Months In Space Before Successfully Reproducing Back On Earth
  • The US’s Surprisingly Recent Plan To Nuke The Moon In Search Of “Negative Mass”
  • 14,400-Year-Old Paw Prints Are World’s Oldest Evidence Of Humans Living Alongside Domesticated Dogs
  • The Tribe That Has Lived Deep Within The Grand Canyon For Over 1,000 Years
  • Finger Monkeys: The Smallest Monkeys In The World Are Tiny, Chatty, And Adorable
  • Atmospheric River Brings North America’s Driest Place 25 Percent Of Its Yearly Rainfall In A Single Day
  • These Extinct Ice Age Giant Ground Sloths Were Fans Of “Cannonball Fruit”, Something We Still Eat Today
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version