• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

USA’s Deadly Nuclear Weapons Testing Legacy In Marshall Islands Worse Than Previously Thought

May 28, 2025 by Deborah Bloomfield

A new study into the legacy of the US nuclear weapons tests in the Marshall Islands has shown the impacts were significantly greater than has previously been acknowledged.

The research, which was commissioned by Greenpeace and conducted by the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IEER), found that all atolls in the Marshall Islands received radioactive fallout during the 67 tests the US conducted between 1946 and 1958, but only three received medical cancer screening. This was despite the islands being populated at the time.

The Marshall Islands are a chain of 29 coral atolls – ring shaped islands formed from coral reefs that encircle lagoons – located in the central Pacific Ocean, between Hawaii and the Philippines. The islands within these atolls have been occupied by humans for thousands of years – but the last century has been particularly turbulent for these communities.

In 1914, the Japanese captured the islands and built military bases there. During this time, the Japanese exercised a militarized regime that forcibly conscripted many locals into their labor force, especially during World War Two. Then, in February 1944, the US army defeated the Japanese on key atolls and effectively liberated them. However, the US recognized the value of these isolated islands for its nuclear weapons programs. Despite the islands having a population of 52,000 people, the US conducted dozens of tests, which spread nuclear fallout throughout the atolls.

The first tests were designed to investigate the impacts nuclear weapons had on naval warships. The tests started at Bikini Atoll in July 1946 and then moved onto thermonuclear weapons testing at Enewetak Atoll in 1951. These later tests were crucial in the eventual development of the first hydrogen bombs. In 1954, the US tested its largest nuclear explosion ever with Castle Bravo, which was 1,000 times stronger than the weapon that was dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima in August 1945.

In this latter test, which exceeded expectations, vast amounts of fallout made up of destroyed coral, water, and other irradiated materials, were transported in the air as snowflake-like ash. Traces of the fallout were distributed across the world, turning up in Japan, India, Australia, Europe, and the US. The public response to this disaster was massive, resulting in global condemnation of nuclear weapons testing.

According to the new IEER report, the capital of the Marshall Islands, Majuro, was officially considered a “very low exposure” atoll. However, radiation levels were tens of times higher than the background gamma radiation levels.

During the decade or so of testing, the Marshallese were unaware of the dangers they were exposed to. Since then, many Marshallese have experienced higher rates of cancer and birth defects, among other conditions. In 2004, the National Cancer Institute estimated the total cancer incidence of the Marshall Islands to be 500 excess cancers due to the nuclear tests, and that 87 percent of them would be located in the northern atolls – which experienced more fallout. The remaining cancers were estimated to have impacted the southern atolls. Then, in 2010, a US government-sponsored study adjusted this to 170 excess cancers.

However, there are many who believe these figures are too conservative and downplay the true extent of the damages – physical, psychological, and environmental – and risks imposed by the tests. Moreover, organizations like Greenpeace, as well as the Marshallese themselves, believe the deadly legacy of the nuclear exposure persists to this day.

“Among the many troubling aspects of the Marshall Islands’ nuclear legacy is that the United States had concluded, in 1948, after just three tests that the Marshall Islands was not ‘a suitable site for atomic experiments’ because it did not meet the required meteorological criteria. Yet testing went on,” Arjun Makhijani, report author and president of the IEER, explained in a statement.

IEER based its findings on a comprehensive assessment of official documents from the US government, military, and energy archives, as well as scientific analysis and medical sources from 1945 to the present.

The report and the IEER’s and Greenpeace’s ongoing work aims to raise greater awareness of the situation in the Marshall Islands, as well as to campaign for compensation from the US government.

“The tests on the Marshall Islands are exemplary of an inhumane, imperial policy that deliberately sacrificed human lives and ignored Pacific cultures. As a result of this nuclear legacy, the Marshallese have been robbed of their land, traditions, and culture, with the people of Bikini and Rongelap forever displaced,” Shiva Gounden, Head of Pacific at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, added.

“The US still fails to acknowledge the full extent of the deep impact. However, these atomic bomb tests are not a closed chapter and they are still having an impact today. Reparations that fit the extent of the harms caused by testing are long overdue.”

The report is published here.  

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Lyft will pay legal fees for drivers sued under Texas abortion ban – CEO
  2. Alphabet gives some Loon patents to SoftBank, open sources flight data and makes patent non-assertion pledge
  3. Among The Vikings, One Nation Was Way More Violent Than Others
  4. Physicist Thinks He May Have Solved The Time Travel “Grandfather Paradox”, But There’s A Twist

Source Link: USA's Deadly Nuclear Weapons Testing Legacy In Marshall Islands Worse Than Previously Thought

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Does The Human Brain Have A Finite Memory Capacity?
  • Record-Breaking Data Transmission Could Transmit Everything On Netflix In Less Than A Second
  • Some Spiders Are More Venomous Than Others – And We Now Know Why
  • Asia’s Other “Great Wall”: Very Unexpected Finds Unearthed At Mongolia’s Medieval Wall System
  • Divorce Doesn’t Hurt The Children – At Least If They’re Birds
  • Four Gorillas Rescued From Illegal Wildlife Trade Have Been Rewilded In The DRC
  • The “Gay Bomb” And Beyond: The US Military’s Wildest Non-Lethal Weapons Schemes
  • Hubble Tension Drama Continues: JWST Data In A Tug-Of-War Between The Two Camps
  • This 300,000-Year-Old Skull Doesn’t Match With Any Human Species
  • 4,000-Year-Old Syrian Baby Rattles Look Surprisingly Familiar
  • Newly Discovered Repeating Radio Source Is First To Be Seen In X-Rays Too
  • Nearly 50 Years After An Infected Injection, Prions Rapidly Take Over A Woman’s Brain
  • “Papahānaumokuākea Is The Poster Child For The Future”: The Incredible Recovery Of One Of The World’s Largest Marine Conservation Areas
  • Many-Worlds Interpretation Challenged As Photon Seems To Be In Two Places At Once
  • Do We Really Share 60 Percent Of Our DNA With A Banana?
  • Mouth Taping: Does This Viral Social Media Trend Really Work – And Is It Safe?
  • Meet The Valais Blacknose, The Cutest Sheep In The World (In Our Totally Objective Opinion)
  • USA’s Deadly Nuclear Weapons Testing Legacy In Marshall Islands Worse Than Previously Thought
  • New COVID Variant NB.1.8.1 Detected Amid Big Changes Coming To Vaccines In US
  • Musk’s SpaceX Starship Lost In Reentry After String Of Explosive Failures During Flight Test
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version