• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

War crimes prosecutor would not focus on US forces in new Afghan probe

September 27, 2021 by David Barret Leave a Comment

September 27, 2021

By Anthony Deutsch and Stephanie van den Berg

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) -The prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on Monday said he was seeking approval to resume a war crimes investigation into Afghanistan, focusing on the actions of the Taliban and the Islamic State Khorasan (ISIS-K) militia.

A statement said the request was being made to the court’s judges in light of developments since the Islamist Taliban movement seized control of Afghanistan in a lightning advance last month.

Prosecutors had previously also looked into suspected crimes by U.S. forces and Afghan government troops. But Karim Khan, six months into his nine-year tenure, said they would now “deprioritise” that element due to lack of resources, and instead focus on “the scale and nature of crimes within the jurisdiction of the court”.

Afghan human rights activist Horia Mosadiq, who has been helping victims to support the ICC probe for many years, called the announcement “an insult to thousands of other victims of crimes by Afghan government forces and U.S. and NATO forces”.

The ICC had already spent 15 years looking into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan before opening a full investigation last year.

But that probe was put on hold by the Afghan government, which said it was investigating the crimes itself. The Hague-based ICC is a court of last resort, intervening only when a member country is unable or unwilling to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity or genocide.

Khan said the fall of the internationally recognised Afghan government and its replacement by the Taliban represented a “significant change of circumstances”.

“After reviewing matters carefully, I have reached the conclusion that, at this time, there is no longer the prospect of genuine and effective domestic investigations … within Afghanistan,” his statement said.

UPHILL BATTLE

The court had found there was a reasonable basis to believe war crimes had been committed between 2003 and 2014, among them suspected mass killings of civilians by the Taliban, as well as suspected torture of prisoners by Afghan authorities and, to a lesser extent, by U.S. forces and the U.S. CIA.

But the United States is not a party to the ICC, and imposed sanctions against the office of the prosecutor for investigating the role of U.S. forces. Shifting the focus of the probe could help mend the court’s relationship with Washington.

A lawyer who represents Afghan victims of suspected U.S. torture in the ICC investigation said the narrowing of its focus was “deeply flawed”.

“Allowing powerful states to get away (with) multi-year, multi-continent torture against so many, feeds impunity for all,” she said on Twitter.

Judges will now review the request.

If approved, the investigation will face an uphill battle to gather evidence, as the Taliban rulers appear unlikely to cooperate in the same way as the governments in place since the Taliban’s last period in power ended in 2001.

The Taliban administration in Kabul could not immediately be reached for comment.

“Early indications suggest that their policies on matters related to criminal justice and other material considerations are unlikely to conform to those adopted since 2002,” Khan said in his submission to the court.

(Reporting by Anthony Deutsch and Stephanie van den Berg; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

Source Link War crimes prosecutor would not focus on US forces in new Afghan probe

David Barret
David Barret

Related posts:

  1. India looking to tax cryptocurrency trades and ecosystem in the country -ET Now
  2. Apple shares recover ground after Epic ruling slide
  3. A reluctant feminist: Germany’s Merkel still inspires many women
  4. Germany’s CDU bemoans collapse in former Communist East

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • US Just Killed NASA’s Mars Sample Return Mission – So What Happens Now?
  • Art Sleuths May Have Recovered Traces Of Da Vinci’s DNA From One Of His Drawings
  • Countries With The Most Narcissists Identified By 45,000-Person Study, And The Results Might Surprise You
  • World’s Oldest Poison Arrows Were Used By Hunters 60,000 Years Ago
  • The Real Reason You Shouldn’t Eat (Most) Raw Cookie Dough
  • Antarctic Scientists Have Just Moved The South Pole – Literally
  • “What We Have Is A Very Good Candidate”: Has The Ancestor Of Homo Sapiens Finally Been Found In Africa?
  • Europe’s Missing Ceratopsian Dinosaurs Have Been Found And They’re Quite Diverse
  • Why Don’t Snorers Wake Themselves Up?
  • Endangered “Northern Native Cat” Captured On Camera For The First Time In 80 Years At Australian Sanctuary
  • Watch 25 Years Of A Supernova Expanding Into Space Squeezed Into This 40-Second NASA Video
  • “Diet Stacking” Trend Could Be Seriously Bad For Your Health
  • Meet The Psychedelic Earth Tiger, A Funky Addition To “10 Species To Watch” In 2026
  • The Weird Mystery Of The “Einstein Desert” In The Hunt For Rogue Planets
  • NASA Astronaut Charles Duke Left A Touching Photograph And Message On The Moon In 1972
  • How Multilingual Are You? This New Language Calculator Lets You Find Out In A Minute
  • Europa’s Seabed Might Be Too Quiet For Life: “The Energy Just Doesn’t Seem To Be There”
  • Amoebae: The Microscopic Health Threat Lurking In Our Water Supplies. Are We Taking Them Seriously?
  • The Last Dogs In Antarctica Were Kicked Out In April 1994 By An International Treaty
  • Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Snapped By NASA’s Europa Mission: “We’re Still Scratching Our Heads About Some Of The Things We’re Seeing”
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2026 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version