• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

We must subsidize and regulate space exploration

September 8, 2021 by David Barret Leave a Comment

Joshua Jahani
Contributor

Share on Twitter

Joshua Jahani is a lecturer at Cornell University and New York University, and a board adviser at the investment bank Jahani and Associates specializing in the Middle East and Africa.

In 1989, Tim Berners-Lee invented the World Wide Web (popularizing the modern internet). He didn’t protect the technology because he wanted it to benefit us all. Three decades later, most of the power — and a lot of the profits — of the internet are in the hands of a few tech billionaires, and much of the early promise of the internet remains unfulfilled.

To avoid the same fate for space, we need to subsidize new players to create competition and lower costs, as well as regulate space travel to ensure safety.

Space matters. It could create countless jobs and fuel economies, and may even hold the solution to climate change. Investors can already see this, having poured billions into space companies in an industry with a potential market value of $1.4 trillion by 2030.

Space may seem too vast to be dominated by a few tech billionaires, but in 1989, so did the internet. We need to get this right, because from the mechanics and aerospace engineers to the marketing, information and logistics workers, the space industry could fuel global job creation and economic growth.

For that to happen, we need competition. What we have now is a few players operating perhaps for their founders’ benefits, not the world’s.

We should not repeat the mistakes we made with the internet and wait for the technology to be abused before we step in. For example, in the Cambridge Analytica scandal, a private technology company used weapons-grade social media manipulation to pursue their own profit (which is their obligation to their shareholders) but to society’s harm (which it is regulators’ job to protect).

In space, the stakes are even higher. They also affect all of humanity, not a few countries. There are environmental dangers (we are probing the carbon cost of “Earth” flights, but not space flights), and an accident, as well as leading to loss of life in space, could send fatal debris to Earth.

These dangers are not unforeseen. Virgin Galactic had its first fatality in 2014. A Space X launch puts out as much carbon dioxide as flying around 300 people across the Atlantic. Earlier this year, some unguided space debris from a Chinese rocket landed in the Maldives.

We should not wait until these accidents happen again — perhaps at a bigger scale — before we act.

Space tourism can and should be about much more than giving the 1% another Instagrammable moment and increasing the wealth of the billionaires who provide the service.

The space industry should be managed in a way that delivers the most good to the largest number of people. That starts with subsidies.

In short, we should treat space travel like any other form of transit. Making that sustainable economically will almost inevitably require some government intervention.

We have been here before: When the combination of air travel, highways and rising labor costs led the two largest railways in the United States to bankruptcy, the Nixon administration intervened and created Amtrak.

This wasn’t ideologically fueled (quite the opposite). This was a decision to make sure the U.S. reaped the economic benefits of interstate travel. Even though Amtrak remains unprofitable 50 years after its creation, it is a crucial piece of economic infrastructure upon which many other industries — as well as millions of individuals and families — rely.

We need to do the same with space travel. Very few individuals will benefit from what will be an uber-luxury segment of the travel market, with Virgin Galactic tickets predicted to cost $250,000 (and that is the entry-level space travel product; Virgin’s competitors are priced at multiples of that cost).

If we subsidize the industry now, while ensuring there are new competitors in space, we can ensure it hits a critical mass where all the broader benefits of space travel become a reality.

This will be much easier than waiting for monopolies to emerge and then trying to fight them (which is what the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is trying to do, decades too late, to Big Tech).

Space travel is not just hype or the plaything of billionaires. It is the final frontier, both physically and economically.

If we want it to be a success, we should learn from our successes and failures back on Earth and apply them to space now.

That means subsidies, support, regulation and safety. These things are important on Earth, but in space they are absolutely essential.

Source Link We must subsidize and regulate space exploration

David Barret
David Barret

Related posts:

  1. What 377 Y Combinator pitches will teach you about startups
  2. Tennis-Fearless teenagers and hungry qualifiers light up U.S. Open
  3. South Africa’s former President Zuma placed on medical parole
  4. Tennis-Qualifier Van de Zandschulp tames Argentine battler to reach quarters

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • How Could Woolly Mammoths Sense When A Storm Was Coming? By Listening With Their Feet
  • A Gulf Between Asia And Africa Is Being Torn Apart By 0.5 Millimeters Each Year
  • We Regret To Inform You If You Look Through An Owl’s Ears You Can See Its Eyes
  • Sailfin Dragons Look Like A Mythical Beast From A Prehistoric Age, But They’re Alive And Kicking
  • Mysterious Mantle Structures May Hold The Key To Why Earth Supports Life
  • Leaked Document Shows Elon Musk’s SpaceX Will Miss Moon Landing Deadline. Here’s What To Know
  • Gelada Mothers Fake Fertility To Save Their Babies From Infanticidal Males
  • Newly Discovered Wolf Snake Species Is Slender, Shiny Black, And It’s Named After Steve Irwin
  • First Ever Leopard Bones Found At Provincial Roman Amphitheatre, Suggesting Bloody Gladiatorial Battles
  • The Solar System Might Be Moving Faster Than Expected – Or There’s Something Off With The Universe
  • Why Do People Who Take The “Spirit Molecule” Describe Such Similar Experiences?
  • The Most Devastating Symptom Of Alzheimer’s Finally Has An Explanation – And, Maybe Soon, A Treatment
  • Kissing Has Survived The Path Of Evolution For 21 Million Years – Apes And Human Ancestors Were All At It
  • NASA To Share Its New Comet 3I/ATLAS Images In Livestream This Week – Here’s How To Watch
  • Did People Have Bigger Foreheads In The Past? The Grisly Truth Behind Those Old Paintings
  • After Three Years Of Searching, NASA Realized It Recorded Over The Apollo 11 Moon Landing Footage
  • Professor Of Astronomy Explains Why You Can’t Fire Your Enemies Straight Into The Sun
  • Do We All See The Same Blue? Brilliant Quiz Shows The Subjective Nature Of Color Perception
  • Earliest Detailed Observations Of A Star Exploding Show True Shape Of A Supernova
  • Balloon-Mounted Telescope Captures Most Precise Observations Of First Known Black Hole Yet
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version