• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

What Is The Best Image We Have Of Atoms?

February 13, 2025 by Deborah Bloomfield

Using advanced telescopes, scientists have looked at light that left galaxies 13.5 billion light-years ago, from the distant galaxy JADES-GS-z14-0. So why do we have such trouble looking the other way, down to the tiniest scales? Can’t we use lenses to see atoms?

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

The short answer is; no. We will never see atoms using visible light, simply because the wavelength of visible light (around 400 to 700 nanometers) is larger than the size of an atom (around 0.1 to 0.3 nanometers). Think of how a pixel on your screen cannot be used to display an object smaller than a pixel.

“It never will be possible to see atoms or molecules using visible light, even with the most powerful of microscopes,” Purdue University explains.

“In order to see an object, its size has to be at least half the wavelength of the light being used to see it. But the wavelength of visible light, though small, is much bigger than an atom, making it invisible. X-rays, however, have a wavelength short enough that they can be used to ‘see’ atoms.”

X-rays have a wavelength of around 0.01 to 10 nanometers, making them small enough to be useful in imaging atoms.

“When X-rays hit a crystallized molecule, the electrons surrounding each atom bend, or diffract, the X-ray beam, which then forms a pattern as it exits — an X-ray diffraction pattern,” Purdue University continues. “Crystals are used because the diffraction pattern from one single molecule could be insignificant, but the many individual, identical molecules in a crystal amplify the pattern.”

Using this, and refining the techniques, scientists have been able to create images of even single atoms.

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE



Electrons are also small enough to be used to image atoms and molecules, using a variety of techniques in electron microscopes. Size isn’t everything, but fortunately, electrons possess another property; a wavelike nature.

“The wave-particle duality of electrons forms the foundation of electron microscopy. By treating electrons as waves, scientists can harness their short wavelengths to create detailed images of atoms,” Electron Beam Machine explains. “This duality also explains why electron beams are so effective for high-resolution imaging. The ability to switch between particle and wave behavior gives electrons unique advantages in studying the smallest building blocks of matter.”

Scientists send beams of electrons at a sample at high speeds, and then detect where they (and other resulting rays) end up.

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

“As the beam passes through or scans across a sample, electrons interact with the atoms in various ways. These interactions produce signals, such as scattered electrons or emitted X-rays, which scientists use to construct images. The electron beam essentially ‘illuminates’ the atomic structure, allowing you to see features that are invisible to the naked eye.”



Scientists have gotten very good at using this technique to view the small world. In recent years, Cornell University researchers combined electron scanning with ptychography – scanning layers of overlapping scattering patterns from a sample – to produce the world’s highest resolution image of atoms. The image (seen at the top) was taken of a praseodymium orthoscandate (PrScO3) crystal, magnified 100 million times.

While impressive, barring some new breakthrough, we might not be able to see atoms in any better resolution.

ADVERTISEMENT GO AD FREE

“This doesn’t just set a new record,” David Muller, Professor of Engineering at Cornell, said in a 2021 statement. “It’s reached a regime which is effectively going to be an ultimate limit for resolution. We basically can now figure out where the atoms are in a very easy way. This opens up a whole lot of new measurement possibilities of things we’ve wanted to do for a very long time. It also solves a long-standing problem – undoing the multiple scattering of the beam in the sample, which Hans Bethe laid out in 1928 – that has blocked us from doing this in the past.”

While there are smaller particles than electrons, they can’t really be used for imaging. Neutrinos, for instance, only interact via the weak force and gravity. We have enough trouble detecting them; they are not going to be great for imaging the very small. Scientists will need to come up with some new clever imaging techniques to see any smaller, or else we may have already seen the parts that make us in the highest resolution we are ever going to get.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Dollar lost for direction awaiting Fed to set its path: Reuters poll
  2. Five Seasons Ventures pulls in €180M fund to tackle human health and climate via FoodTech
  3. Humanity’s Journey To A Metal-Rich Asteroid Launches Today. Here’s How To Watch
  4. Unexplained And Deadly Heat Wave Hotspots Are Showing Up Across The Planet

Source Link: What Is The Best Image We Have Of Atoms?

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Krampusnacht: What’s Up With The Terrifying Christmas-Time Pagan Parades In Europe?
  • Why Does The President Pardon A Turkey For Thanksgiving?
  • In 1954, Soviet Scientist Vladimir Demikhov Performed “The Most Controversial Experimental Operation Of The 20th Century”
  • Watch Platinum Crystals Forming In Liquid Metal Thanks To “Really Special” New Technique
  • Why Do Cuttlefish Have Wavy Pupils?
  • How Many Teeth Did T. Rex Have?
  • What Is The Rarest Color In Nature? It’s Not Blue
  • When Did Some Ancient Extinct Species Return To The Sea? Machine Learning Helps Find The Answer
  • Australia Is About To Ban Social Media For Under-16s. What Will That Look Like (And Is It A Good Idea?)
  • Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS May Have A Course-Altering Encounter Before It Heads Towards The Gemini Constellation
  • When Did Humans First Start Eating Meat?
  • The Biggest Deposit Of Monetary Gold? It Is Not Fort Knox, It’s In A Manhattan Basement
  • Is mRNA The Future Of Flu Shots? New Vaccine 34.5 Percent More Effective Than Standard Shots In Trials
  • What Did Dodo Meat Taste Like? Probably Better Than You’ve Been Led To Believe
  • Objects Look Different At The Speed Of Light: The “Terrell-Penrose” Effect Gets Visualized In Twisted Experiment
  • The Universe Could Be Simple – We Might Be What Makes It Complicated, Suggests New Quantum Gravity Paper Prof Brian Cox Calls “Exhilarating”
  • First-Ever Human Case Of H5N5 Bird Flu Results In Death Of Washington State Resident
  • This Region Of The US Was Riddled With “Forever Chemicals.” They Just Discovered Why.
  • There Is Something “Very Wrong” With Our Understanding Of The Universe, Telescope Final Data Confirms
  • An Ethiopian Shield Volcano Has Just Erupted, For The First Time In Thousands Of Years
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version