• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

What’s Your Love Language? It Could Be Less Important Than You Think

January 16, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

What’s your love language? Are you particularly receptive to words of affirmation? Or maybe you appreciate spending quality time with your partner, or cherish physical touch, or splashing out on a gift to express your love. Whatever your love language is, it has one thing in common with the others: none of them are supported by empirical research, according to a new study.

The notion of love languages has become deeply entrenched in society these days. In fact, the idea that people express and receive love in specific ways has become so popular that it has featured in various memes and as lyrics to songs.

Advertisement

The concept was first introduced by Gary Chapman in 1992, when he published his influential The 5 Love Languages: The Secret to Love That Lasts, where he explained how there are five unique categories related to communicating love. The development of these categories was based on his experience in marriage counseling and linguistics. Since then, Chapman’s book has been translated into 50 languages and sold over 20 million copies worldwide.

The idea has spread far and wide; a casual Google search will offer you a glut of advice pages, charts, and quizzes, not only to help you identify your own love language, but also to offer tips on how to communicate it to your partner. There are even government initiatives that have been influenced by Chapman’s principles, including a $20 million relationship education and counseling programme that the Australian government has backed.

But while the idea may be cute, is it accurate? Well, as with all popular psychological ideas that try to compress complex social behaviours into easily digestible and identifiable categories, there are skeptics. And now a new study has poured cold water on Chapman’s ideas by finding very little empirical data to support it.

“Although there is only a limited body of empirical research on love languages”, the authors write, “the work that does exist does not provide strong support for the validity of the love languages’ core assumptions.”

Advertisement

Firstly, contrary to the prevailing idea that we all have our own specific form of love expression, our “primary [love] language”, research has consistently shown that people tend to “endorse all five love languages as meaningful ways of expressing love and feeling loved.”

This is a bit of a blow to one of the main principles of the love language system. If individuals do not actually have a preference for a specific language, then everything the idea is built on starts to wobble.

The second assumption, that there are only five forms of love language appears to be equally shaky. According to the researcher’s review of the existing literature, there are more ways to express love, including supporting a partner’s personal growth and autonomy. In addition, incorporating your partners into your wider social networks and developing conflict management strategies are also key.

Finally, Chapman’s third key assumption, that couples who “speak” the same love language report greater relationship quality, has also failed to show any meaningful evidence to support it. When testing whether couples who share the same languages (vs. those who don’t) claim to be more satisfied, the results were not empirically significant. In contrast, the evidence seems to suggest that receiving any form of love is associated with greater relationship satisfaction.

Advertisement

Responding to the study, Chapman has said that his book’s success speaks for itself. As he told the Washington Post, “I think the fact that so many millions of people have read the book, so many people have found it to be helpful in their relationship, that I’m convinced it can have a tremendous positive impact on a marriage.”

How can over 20 million people be wrong? Well it wouldn’t be the first time in history a large body of people believed and endorsed something that has little basis in reality.

Love as a diet?

So how do the researchers recommend we think about our love expressions and relationships if they have now toppled the romantic Tower of Babel? They recommend viewing relationships as a kind of balanced diet:

“We offer an alternative metaphor that we believe more accurately reflects a large body of empirical research on relationships: Love is not akin to a language one needs to learn to speak but can be more appropriately understood as a balanced diet in which people need a full range of essential nutrients to cultivate lasting love.”

Advertisement

The explain that, just as we need a varied diet providing all the key nutritional ingredients, such as carbs, protein, fats, vitamins, and minerals, so too do our love lives.

“[A]lthough people might be able to successfully maintain their relationships even if they are missing a particular ingredient (e.g., lack of physical touch in long-distance relationships), the best relationships will be ones in which partners spend time together (quality time), express appreciation (words of affirmation), show affection (physical touch), help and support each other (acts of service), and make each other feel special (which is presumably the intention behind gifts), among other behaviors (e.g., support for personal goals and autonomy) not captured in Chapman’s five love languages.”

The study is published in Current Directions in Psychological Science.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Tennis-‘Experienced’ Medvedev the last hurdle in Djokovic’s pursuit of history
  2. Bulk of S&P 500 embraces sustainable accounting standard, foundation says
  3. PideDirecto bags $5.25M; aims to be ‘Shopify with 30-minute deliveries’
  4. A Spy Creature Gets Its Shell Home Stolen In BBC’s New “Spy In The Ocean”

Source Link: What's Your Love Language? It Could Be Less Important Than You Think

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • “The Wood Frog Comes Back To Life”: Meet The Real-Life Frogsicle That Can Survive Freezing
  • Meet The Dragon Prince, A New Dinosaur That’s Rewriting What We Know About Tyrannosaur Evolution
  • Incredible Laser Tool Can Read Tiny Text From Over A Kilometer Away, Perfect For The Spy Of Tomorrow
  • How Vantablack – The Blackest Paint On Earth – Could Save Astronomy
  • Fish Suffer “10 Minutes Of Intense Pain” Before Dying In Commercial Fishing Operations
  • China Reveals First Deep-Sea “Testing Site”, Adding To Vast Network Of Marine Bases
  • The “Spiritual Bliss Attractor”: Something Weird Happens When You Leave Two AIs Talking To Each Other
  • Incredibly Rare “Ghost Elephant” Seen In Niokolo-Koba National Park For The First Time In Years
  • Watch: First-Ever Footage Of Sun’s South Pole Gives Spellbinding New View Of Our Star
  • NASA’s Voyager Spacecraft Found A 30,000-50,000 Kelvin “Wall” At The Edge Of Our Solar System
  • Shark Got A Hole In It? All-New Classification System Can Tell You Why
  • Why Was Crossing The Rubicon (A Pretty Pathetic River) Such A Big Deal?
  • First-Ever Documented Reports Of Galapagos Sharks Using Manta Rays As Mobile Cleaning Stations
  • Viking Woman And Her Pet Dog Discovered In 1,000-Year-Old Boat Burial
  • Bach-To-Bach Classical Music Can Make Plants Grow Better
  • NASA Observations Suggest Asteroid 2024 YR4 Now Has 1-In-23 Chance To Hit The Moon In 2032
  • Gold Coins Among The San José, AKA “World’s Richest Shipwreck,” Confirm Its Identity
  • Emperor Penguins Could Be Disappearing Faster Than Even Our Worst Fears
  • Is This The End Of The “Gates Of Hell” In Turkmenistan?
  • Franz Reichelt And The Eiffel Tower Wingsuit Incident Of 1912
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version