• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Why Is It So Difficult For Witnesses To Positively Identify Criminals?

November 18, 2023 by Deborah Bloomfield

We’ve all seen it in movies and on TV. The witness watches from behind a two-way mirror while a line of potential perps files into a room. They turn to the left, then to the right, and maybe one or two of them step forward for a closer look. Then the million-dollar question: are any of these the person the police are looking for? But what happens if you just can’t be sure?

Although eyewitness testimonies can be key pieces of evidence for law enforcement building their cases, a witness can sometimes pick the wrong person, with potentially devastating consequences. Because of the high stakes, there’s an urgent need for scientists to try and figure out what factors can make it more difficult for a witness to make a positive – and correct – identification.  

Advertisement

“We have clear information from the Innocence Project in the US and other cases around the globe, that of the people who have been convicted and later found to be innocent, approximately 70 percent have been imprisoned, at least partly, due to misidentification,” explained study lead Thomas Nyman, an assistant professor at New York University Shanghai, in a statement.

Previous research has focused a lot on how police can best conduct lineups to give a witness the greatest possible chance of correctly recognizing their perp, but Nyman’s study went back a little further, looking at the effect of different variables at the actual time the witness observes the person committing the crime.

“No earlier research has investigated the combined effects of increased distance, decreased lighting, and facial masking on eyewitness identification accuracy using live mock criminals,” Nyman told PsyPost. 

The team recruited 1,325 participants during visits to the Heureka Science Centre in Finland, who observed mock criminals from different distances and in different lighting conditions. The “criminals” also took different steps to obscure their faces, such as wearing a hood or sunglasses. After 20 seconds of observation, the volunteers were asked to identify their “criminal” from an eight-person lineup. 

Advertisement

As the statement explains, the number of participants makes this one of the largest live studies ever conducted. Although the study was designed like a game to attract as broad a range of people as possible to take part, the team tried, as best they could, to recapitulate a real-world scenario for an eyewitness to a crime.

“A lot of [the design] had to do with what are real-life settings like. What do criminals actually do?” said Nyman. “If it’s worse lighting you might think now is an optimal time to go out and commit a crime, because no one is going to see you.”

The factor that had the biggest effect, the results showed, was distance – it was much more difficult to make a positive identification when the “criminal” had been observed from the furthest distance of 20 meters (66 feet). Sunglasses also hampered the witnesses’ ability to ID their suspect, but surprisingly, using a hood to hide their face did not make much of a difference.

With no facial masking in place, witnesses could identify a suspect observed from 5 meters (16 feet) away with 69 percent accuracy, dropping to just 17 percent at 20 meters. When sunglasses were worn in daylight, accuracy at 5 meters plummeted to 32 percent. When sunglasses were worn in twilight, accuracy at 5 meters was roughly the same at 33 percent, but at 20 meters it tanked to only 8 percent.

Advertisement

While not an exact replica of a real-life crime scenario – for one thing, the witnesses knew that they were going to be asked to ID the suspect later, which rarely happens in the real world – the study does raise some important questions for researchers to explore further.

“One thing I would like to see is a systematic investigation into how often these factors (e.g., increased distance, decreased lighting, various facial masking) are present in real-life criminal events,” Nyman told PsyPost. 

Summarizing the findings in the statement, Nyman concluded, “If you can exclude unreliable identifications, it would mean that fewer innocent people will go to prison. And that’s what this whole project is about: trying to protect people.”

The study is published in the journal Psychology, Crime & Law. 

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Paris ramps up security as jihadist attacks trial starts
  2. Cricket-‘Western bloc’ has let Pakistan down, board chief says
  3. Ancient Bison Found In Permafrost Is So Well Preserved Scientists Want To Clone It
  4. Where Inside Us Do We Feel Love?

Source Link: Why Is It So Difficult For Witnesses To Positively Identify Criminals?

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • Chimps Are Sticking Grass In Their Ears And Rears As They Embrace “Pointless” Fad
  • Hui Te Rangiora: Old Māori Legend Suggests They May Have Discovered Antarctica 1,000 Years Before Europeans
  • “Potential Impact On Saturn”: Astronomers Appeal For Help As Video Appears To Show Object Hitting The Gas Giant
  • What Is Prosopometamorphopsia? The “Exceedingly Rare” Condition That Made A Patient See Faces As Dragons
  • Are We In An Enormous Void? It Could Explain What’s Wrong With Our Model Of The Universe
  • Woylies Boing Back Into Western Australia Thanks To Groundbreaking Wildlife Project
  • North America’s Oldest Pterosaur And Turtle Fossils Found In Arizona’s Petrified Forest
  • Proposed “Dark Dwarfs” Near The Galactic Center Could Reveal The Nature Of Dark Matter
  • Watch: 18-Kilometer-High Ash Cloud Looms Over Indonesia’s Mount Lewotobi Laki Laki After “Explosive” Eruption
  • “ShipGoo001”: Mystery Of Entirely New Lifeform Discovered Coating A Great Lakes Ship
  • Rare White Humpback Whale Calf Filmed By Drone Off Australia’s East Coast
  • Who Was Buried At Cave Of Salome: A Female Disciple, Jesus’ Midwife, Or A Princess?
  • “Hidden” Changes To US Health Data Swapping “Gender” For “Sex” Spark Fears For Public Trust
  • Easter Island Was Never As Isolated As We Thought – Study Puts That “Strange Argument” To Bed
  • If Birds Are Dinosaurs, Why Are None As Big As T. Rexes?
  • Psychologists Demonstrate Illusion That Could Be Screwing Up Our Perception Of Time
  • Why Are So Many Enormous Roman Shoes Being Discovered At Hadrian’s Wall?
  • Scientists Think They’ve Pinpointed Structural Differences In Psychopaths’ Brains
  • We’ve Found Our Third-Ever Interstellar Visitor, Orcas Filmed Kissing (With Tongues) In The Wild, And Much More This Week
  • The “Eyes Of Clavius” Will Be Visible On The Moon Today, Thanks To Clair-Obscur Effect
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version