• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

Why You Shouldn’t Take Seashells From Beaches

May 17, 2024 by Deborah Bloomfield

Seashells may seem like a harmless memento from your trip to the beach, but there are a few good reasons why you let it be and leave them on the shore.

Advertisement

Beachcombing, if done carelessly, has the potential to cause real upset for coastal ecosystems. A study in 2014 investigated the removal of seashells from beaches and concluded it’s causing “significant damage” to the many lifeforms that rely on shells.

Advertisement

Shells are a surprisingly important cog in coastal ecosystems. Along with beach stabilization providing birds with building materials for their nests, they provide a home or attachment surface for diverse marine organisms, including algae, seagrass, sponges, and crutseans. They are also a source of calcium carbonate, which can dissolve in seawater and be recycled back into the ocean.

“Shells are remarkable in that they serve multiple functions in natural ecosystems,” Michal Kowalewski, lead study author and paleontologist at the Florida Museum, said in a statement. 

“Molluscan shells are of prime importance to hermit crabs, and although sand beaches are not good places for such crabs, dead snail shells on mud-flats and rocky shores do form a primary resource for abundant hermit crabs. More subtly, many small organisms settle on dead shells, and so removing such shells will eliminate habitats for these colonists,” added Geerat Vermeij, a mollusk shell expert and distinguished professor of geology at the University of California Davis, who was not involved in the study.

The study saw researchers carry out multiple monthly surveys from 1978 to 1981 and from 2008 to 2010 on Llarga Beach, an hour-long car ride from Barcelona in Spain. Their results showed the number of seashells had been decimated by up to 60 percent between the two study periods. 

Advertisement

They suspected that the demise of shells was most likely due to the influx of tourists to the area because shells were more abundant during the winter period when fewer people visited the beach.

“Humans may play a significant role in altering habitats through activities that many would perceive as mostly harmless, such as beachcombing and seashell collecting. It is important that we continue to investigate the more subtle aspects of tourism-related activities and their impact on shoreline habitats,” Kowalewski said.

Another good reason to not take home seashells: it’s illegal in many parts of the world. In the UK, the Coastal Protection Act 1949 prohibits taking any natural materials from public beaches. 

It’s a little more relaxed in the US where recreational collection of empty sea shells is permitted in many circumstances. However, certain species are protected and harvesting their live shells could land you in trouble with the law. 

Advertisement

In 2018, a woman was reportedly jailed after she took 40 seashells from the beach in Florida’s Key West. The shells contained live queen conches, which are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The 30-year-old woman was ordered to serve 15 days in jail and pay a $500 fine – that’s one way to ruin your holiday.

Deborah Bloomfield
Deborah Bloomfield

Related posts:

  1. Lithuania to fence first 110 km of Belarus border by April
  2. China’s ICBC to restrict some forex and commodities trading
  3. Potential New Treatment For Alcohol Use Disorder Identified By Scientists
  4. Why Is Earth’s Inner Core Solid When It’s Hotter Than The Sun’s Surface?

Source Link: Why You Shouldn't Take Seashells From Beaches

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

  • The Man Who Fell From Space: These Are The Last Words Of Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov
  • How Long Can A Bird Can Fly Without Landing?
  • Earliest Evidence Of Making Fire Has Been Discovered, X-Rays Of 3I/ATLAS Reveal Signature Unseen In Other Interstellar Objects, And Much More This Week
  • Could This Weirdly Moving Comet Have Been The Real “Star Of Bethlehem”?
  • How Monogamous Are Humans Vs. Other Mammals? Somewhere Between Beavers And Meerkats, Apparently
  • A 4,900-Year-Old Tree Called Prometheus Was Once The World’s Oldest. Then, A Scientist Cut It Down
  • Descartes Thought The Pineal Gland Was “The Seat Of The Soul” – And Some People Still Do
  • Want To Know What The Last 2 Minutes Before Being Swallowed By A Volcanic Eruption Look Like? Now You Can
  • The Three Norths Are Moving On: A Once-In-A-Lifetime Alignment Shifts This Weekend
  • Spectacular Photo Captures Two Rare Atmospheric Phenomena At The Same Time
  • How America’s Aerospace Defense Came To Track Santa Claus For 70 Years
  • 3200 Phaethon: Parent Body Of Geminids Meteor Shower Is One Of The Strangest Objects We Know Of
  • Does Sleeping On A Problem Actually Help? Yes – It’s Science-Approved
  • Scientists Find A “Unique Group” Of Polar Bears Evolving To Survive The Modern World
  • Politics May Have Just Killed Our Chances To See A Tom Cruise Movie Actually Shot In Space
  • Why Is The Head On Beer Often White, When Beer Itself Isn’t?
  • Fabric Painted With Dye Made From Bacteria Could Protect Astronauts From Radiation On Moon
  • There Used To Be 27 Letters In The English Alphabet, Until One Mysteriously Vanished
  • Why You Need To Stop Chucking That “Liquid Gold” Down Your Kitchen Sink
  • Youngest Mammoth Fossils Ever Found Turn Out To Be Whales… 400 Kilometers From The Coast
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version