• Email Us: [email protected]
  • Contact Us: +1 718 874 1545
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Medical Market Report

  • Home
  • All Reports
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

3 strategies to make adopting new HR tech easier for hiring managers

September 16, 2021 by David Barret Leave a Comment

Neil Morelli
Contributor

Share on Twitter

Neil Morelli, Ph.D, is the chief industrial-organizational psychologist at Codility, a pre-hire assessment platform for software engineering talent. He has spent more than 10 years in technology-enabled talent acquisition, helping Fortune 500 and venture-backed tech companies create effective and inclusive hiring practices.

Recruiting for technical roles can be challenging. There are often too many roles to fill, too many or too few candidates to interview and not enough time to get it all done and develop relationships with your key stakeholders: Hiring managers and the executive team.

Working with talent acquisition (TA) leaders and technical recruiters can help companies scalably, accurately and fairly assess potential candidates’ technical skills to fill high-value engineering roles. Technology also offers many advantages that help achieve TA objectives. But in my experience, many TA and HR leaders get frustrated when new tools fail to launch or deliver underwhelming results, because they aren’t adequately adopted, trusted or utilized by end users.

I find that hiring managers are more open-minded to “mechanical” or automated hiring tools if those tools aren’t evaluated on their own, but are evaluated relative to status quo hiring processes.

All of this leads to technical decision-makers and stakeholders developing a natural skepticism for mechanical or automated hiring tools. If your hiring managers seem doubtful about using tech for hiring, here are three strategies to help them embrace hiring tools.

Expect skepticism, it’s natural

Researchers studying how to make scientific hiring tools more effective have discovered an interesting phenomenon: Human beings are naturally skeptical of tools that outsource our decisions (Highhouse, 2008). Left to our own devices, we are hardwired to trust gut instinct over external data points, especially when developing and nurturing new relationships, including who we work with.

Scientists have offered up a few explanations for this preference of gut over data. Some people consider external, mechanical decision-making aids as less trustworthy because of a lack of familiarity with how they work, or because using them reflects poorly on the decision-maker’s value and worth as a leader or manager.

It could also be because there’s a fear of surrendering control and agency to a tool that doesn’t seem to consider or understand context clues. However, research has shown that people make better choices when using mechanical decision support tools than when either humans or mechanical tools make decisions alone.

Source Link 3 strategies to make adopting new HR tech easier for hiring managers

David Barret
David Barret

Related posts:

  1. Myanmar’s Suu Kyi back in court after absence, still ‘somewhat dizzy’ -lawyer
  2. Vladimir Putin is to self-isolate after COVID-19 detected in entourage – Kremlin
  3. BAE Systems sees big opportunity in space after UK satellite deal
  4. Toyota, Honda urge Congress to reject expanded tax incentive that would benefit Ford, GM, Stellantis

Filed Under: News

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

  • The Pinky Toe Has A Purpose And Most People Are Just Finding Out
  • What Is This Massive Heat-Emitting Mass Discovered Beneath The Moon’s Surface?
  • The Man Who Fell From Space: These Are The Last Words Of Cosmonaut Vladimir Komarov
  • How Long Can A Bird Can Fly Without Landing?
  • Earliest Evidence Of Making Fire Has Been Discovered, X-Rays Of 3I/ATLAS Reveal Signature Unseen In Other Interstellar Objects, And Much More This Week
  • Could This Weirdly Moving Comet Have Been The Real “Star Of Bethlehem”?
  • How Monogamous Are Humans Vs. Other Mammals? Somewhere Between Beavers And Meerkats, Apparently
  • A 4,900-Year-Old Tree Called Prometheus Was Once The World’s Oldest. Then, A Scientist Cut It Down
  • Descartes Thought The Pineal Gland Was “The Seat Of The Soul” – And Some People Still Do
  • Want To Know What The Last 2 Minutes Before Being Swallowed By A Volcanic Eruption Look Like? Now You Can
  • The Three Norths Are Moving On: A Once-In-A-Lifetime Alignment Shifts This Weekend
  • Spectacular Photo Captures Two Rare Atmospheric Phenomena At The Same Time
  • How America’s Aerospace Defense Came To Track Santa Claus For 70 Years
  • 3200 Phaethon: Parent Body Of Geminids Meteor Shower Is One Of The Strangest Objects We Know Of
  • Does Sleeping On A Problem Actually Help? Yes – It’s Science-Approved
  • Scientists Find A “Unique Group” Of Polar Bears Evolving To Survive The Modern World
  • Politics May Have Just Killed Our Chances To See A Tom Cruise Movie Actually Shot In Space
  • Why Is The Head On Beer Often White, When Beer Itself Isn’t?
  • Fabric Painted With Dye Made From Bacteria Could Protect Astronauts From Radiation On Moon
  • There Used To Be 27 Letters In The English Alphabet, Until One Mysteriously Vanished
  • Business
  • Health
  • News
  • Science
  • Technology
  • +1 718 874 1545
  • +91 78878 22626
  • [email protected]
Office Address
Prudour Pvt. Ltd. 420 Lexington Avenue Suite 300 New York City, NY 10170.

Powered by Prudour Network

Copyrights © 2025 · Medical Market Report. All Rights Reserved.

Go to mobile version